Manifestly unfounded as the Makis Voridis Opposition proposals calling for criminal prosecution against him for his case OPECEPE. The former minister said he was attributed to criminal liability and was abandoned as a member of a criminal organization because he said he “Agree” to a ministerial decision implemented since 2015 and because he called for his resignation.
“The same ministerial decision was also written by SYRIZA’s ministers S. Arachovitis and E. Apostolou. Criminals and they, ”he said, among other things. In closing his position he explained to the members of the National Delegation that as a minister he had the power or ability to legislate or amend any ministerial decision instead of violating it.
«I was expecting to hear the rapporteurs of the parties and the category. I didn’t hear anything. This has a reason. Because in the same embarrassment that the rapporteurs have been found, I am a month now. I try to figure out what the crime is attributed to me » said by starting his placement.
“In order to have a crime, there must be an act or omission of energy that is characterized by the Criminal Code. So these acts must be described. Let’s see them. Prosecutors in the 34 -page text report my name in 2 points. The first is the “Agree” The second concerns my request to War to resign. But is it possible to do criminal activity with legal acts? Is this? “ noted himself.
Regarding the document that bears his own “Agree” he said “was put into a document implemented by a ministerial decision. The ministerial decision is legal and strong even today. I say that I agree to implement the ministerial decision and this “agree” you say it is a criminal act. Seriously now? The second thing you tell me is that I asked Mr Vara’s resignation. Now Savara will you ask for the prosecution of ministers because they have requested their resignation? “.
Pears of these Mr. Voridis noted that His opposition attributes his or her offense of moral on an offense that does not have a natural perpetrator.
“You with your suggestions give me synergies and morals. Member or pressed someone to do illegal act you say. Do you want to tell me who makes this illegal act? There is no natural perpetrator. You can’t say that you know why? Because, no criminal prosecutions have been brought to all of them. And because criminal prosecutions have not been brought to all of them that I have been synergy with an unknown physical perpetrator for an unknown act. These suggestions are manifestly unfounded because they cannot be cured by any preliminary examination » he said.
The former minister even filed an opinion of Mr. Flogaite which states that the OPECEPE document that bears Mr Voridis’ “Agree” is an internal, not administrative act and does not produce legal effects.
«Of the 3 mm of pages of the case file there are these two documents that concern me. I “agree” and the deposition of Varra. These are the indications you need to evaluate. “Agree” is not disputed. It exists in an OPECEPE document that informs me about how the pasture is distributed. What is this act? Is it an administrative act? No, it is an internal document of OPECEPE. I’m not saying that. He says it in his opinion by Mr. Flogitis. I have given him this document and says “the document brings neither the external nor the major administrative characteristics …”. It is not an administrative act, it does not produce legal effects. This is what he says. “ noted
Continuing his speech, he said mainly to SYRIZA: “By the way, the distribution of OPEKEPE is illegal or implemented a ministerial decision? Applies a ministerial decision. By the way if the service that has the sole responsibility of the allocation of a grazing document that shows the way you all bears to you, what would you do? And if you agreed with the suggestion of the competent service would you be a crime? To ask SYRIZA: This document, the act of allocation was drawn up by the then president of OPECEPE, Mr. Kaprellis, who you placed. “
Mr. Voridis noted that exactly the same document signed by himself His predecessors had previously signed by SYRIZA.
“Mr Arachovitis has signed such distributions. Question: Criminal and Mr Arachovitis? Another document on the distribution of 2016 is “Agree” by Mr. Apostolou. A criminal too? “ He said, explaining that those decisions also provided for the assignment of pastures to the Peloponnese to Crete.
«And you come today and tell me that SYRIZA ministers, in succession in consultation with Mr Kaprellis, have set up a criminal organization in which I decided to join my first quarter of my term to do what they were doing together. This is what you say“He stressed to add:
«Do you tell me that I shouldn’t have approved it or change the ministerial decision? This is a beautiful political criticism. Let her tell me and explain to you. When SYRIZA was legislated, the possibility of subsidizing animals without animals was made by a European decision. And if we cut it, we would have to explain it because the Frenchman the German can get such subsidies and we cut it from Greek breeders. The SYRIZA government has made this choice and you now tell me that I was going wrong and I was going to change it. Accepted, but this is a political choice not a crime. Let’s see the other. If I changed it and cut it. If I cut it, would the farmers of Crete take their support? No. Let’s explain it Manolis Chnari. And when the farmer of Crete came and tell us that he had 1000 sheep and does not get what he is entitled to tell him that we cut him because perhaps one next to him would do something illegal. To tell him and see what would he tell usa”.
He also pointed out that instead of annulled the ministerial decision he ordered mass audits. “These checks revealed the 3000 VAUs cited by Varra,” he said.
Mr Voridis argued that the examination would enable them to discuss all the issues by explaining that “SYRIZA was in front of a state of removal of pastures and reducing benefits by our breeders because the concept of pasture had changed from the EU. Regions and for 5 years nothing had been done and I changed this and I granted a grazing plans and I gave the responsibility to the Ministry of Rural Development.
Regarding the second act attributed to him and concerning the resignation of Mr Varra, he said: “I am coming to the resignation now. But let’s agree that it is paradoxical to ask for prosecution because I asked for the resignation of a subordinate of mine. Listen to what you want to prosecute to the minister. to add ‘When an exam I imagine, Mr. Varras will be called and asked about the issue of checks. But what does Mr. Varra say? That he had never informed me of the checks. Nice if I didn’t know about the checks that I would ask him for something I didn’t know? Also note, a month before his resignation, Mr Varras said about his cooperation with the then Minister, that is, to me, that the relationship and cooperation are excellent for achieving our common goal. When did this change; “. At the same time, he explained that the presidents of OPEKEPE have a closed term and their retirement requires their own agreement.
Mr Voridis announced more revelations during the examination of the examination. “At this stage I will limit myself to them. And I will clarify them with great joy in the Inquiry Committee. There I will clarify various others. What I say to everyone is: Everyone will say in the case what they have to say. I close by saying that when I learned about the transmission of a file I thought if I had done something illegal. Confessional to tell you something else. Ministers are strong because they have legislative jurisdiction, that is, the rules. The threshold of the Minister’s action is the Constitution. If he does not like a law or ministerial decision changes it. If I don’t like a ministerial decision I change it. I have no reason to illegally. I can change the law » He said to emphasize “I am 18 years I am here and I have never refused parliamentary control but to tell me that I have been a criminal offense because I asked for my resignation to go a long way.”
Pamela Anderson and Liam Nyson are a couple – what reveals a source close to the two actors