The European Parliament did not pass on the motion of censure that had been submitted to her Ursula von der Layena “breath” decision for the European Commission. 360 MEPs supported its president Commission. 175 voted in favor of the motion of censure and 18 abstained.
The impression proposal had been filed by the far -right ‘patriots for Europe’ In the way in which Ursula von der Laene managed the supply of vaccines during the crowns and her role in the Pfizergate scandal. She described the inspirers of the proposal of mistrust as “extremists”, “antibiotics” and “fans of Putin”.
If the proposal was passing it would drive In the resignation of a European Commission. Ursula von der Layen was not present at the European Parliament at the time of the vote, as she at the same time speaking her speech at the “Ukraine rebuilding” in Rome today (10.07.2025).
The motion of censure was submitted by MEP Georgue Popeea (ECR, Romania), who accuses von der Layen of opacity on the occasion of the “Pfizergate” scandal. But it was a move doomed to failure. The European Parliament’s pro -European alliance had stated that he would vote against the censure proposed by the far -right, and the Italian MEPs of the George Melonian Party, which belongs to the European Conservatives and Reformers (ECR), had stated that they would reject it.
The president of the Commission, however, is anyway “injured”. The attitude of Ursula von der Laienne and her shift to more right -wing policies It has caused the rage of Social Democrats and Liberal MEPs in whom it “owes” its presidency.
The demonstration of the European People’s Party, however, to which the Commission President belongs, has not helped the climate between the political groups that are the so -called “pro -European majority” in the European Parliament. The Liberal The Renew team had decided to vote against the motion of censure filed by far -right MEPs, but their support does not in any way mean that the parties’ relationship has improved.
So the Social Democrats, Those who are also not happy with President von Der Lien, have decided to vote against the motion of censure and not abstain from the vote, as they had initially stated. They made this decision as the Commission gave them exchanges, such as the president’s commitment to include the