“With this legally legally category, he is practicing his exemption from the Judicial Council”
“New Democracy is like wanting the locker room to limit the framework for criminal liability for Mr Karamanlis,” said PASOK Change Press spokesman, Kostas Tsoukalas, to Real FM R/S, regarding the ND’s request for the establishment of a pre -trial committee for Mr Karamanlis to investigate the wrongdoing of the breach of duty.
He said that PASOK in his proposal is being rationalized by Mr Bakaimi, “where he explicitly states that the Ministry of Transport and Infrastructure is supervised by security, which is why the Court of Justice is referring to the Director -General”. “Regardless of Ras’ responsibility, the Ministry of Transport also has an independent supervisory responsibility for security, not just administrative supervision. A ministry cannot be responsible, but the Minister may not even be checked for it. “he stressed. “How is it done,” he commented, “to argue the ND that the officials are being prosecuted because they did not take pre -preparation to inform the minister to take security measures and at the same time insist that the Minister had no responsibility for the security.” And asked the question: “So why are they referred, since the minister could not do anything even if they had done preparatory actions?”
Concerning the legal validity of PASOK’s request, he noted that “when we have documents with protocol number, where the officials say that Mr. Karamanlis was aware, the data exist”.
Regarding the criminal category of the ND for its former minister, he argued that “he is cut and stitched, to reach the Judicial Council and to relieve him with a parliament”. “Not even reach the Special Court. Because if he goes with this accusation, which I really think he is, the Judicial Council will relieve him. “continued.
PASOK’s spokesman also referred extensively to the “Corruption Scandal in OPEKEPE for days of ND”, stressing that “responsibilities must be investigated, because here we have a scandal that has grown from 2020 onwards”. He said that “already in 2020 there were serious complaints about illegal subsidies and serious indications of an organized network of abuse. All ND ministers who took over the relevant portfolio did not investigate these complaints. ” “I remember Mr Avgenakis complaining to the PASOK president that he is wrong with the issue and that OPEKEPE is making a successful rebranding. A year later, OPECEPE is closing, “he commented, stressing: “Don’t Mr Avgenakis feel the need for Mr Voridis to take a stand for what is happening? Today it appears that the president of OPEKEPE in 2020 had frozen 3,500 suspected VAT ID had forwarded files to the authorities. “ He therefore stressed that “it must be investigated whether political leadership has operated” protective ” – consciously or unconsciously – to a mechanism that distributed European aid to the detriment of real beneficiaries”. Concerning OPECEPE’s “government intention” to AADE, Mr Tsoukalas commented that he was creating a concern “maybe some people do not want to check with OPEKEPE open and are trying to put out the drawing of data”.
He stressed that PASOK wants the full clarification of the case, adding that “we will see what initiatives this can reach all political, administrative and service levels”. “But we first expect the public placement, especially the ministers of this period, ministers who were shaking their finger on those who criticized these issues,” he said.
In the wake of the Prime Minister’s announcements to establish a new authority for accuracy, he commented that he “called it a” new tool “, noting that, but, however, noting that, however “We have proposed this tool as PASOK for three years with a detailed description of the Supervisory-Play Framework and the transfer of real and substantive responsibilities.” “Let the government answer us because it took her three years to institutionalize her and how the damage that caused consumers from the inadequacy of controls will be reversed,” he noted.