“The democratic party has a very wide social space, which today is indeed divided and must be expressed by a majority through PASOK so that political change can be launched in terms of victory,” his spokesman said. Change, Kostas Tsoukalasin his television presence in his “Morning Point” show Mega News.
He commented that he did not believe in “Quinates”, nor the saviors, and emphasized that “the democratic party has a leader, a new political personnel and the country’s governance program. That’s why he is a very big attack. ” He argued that “a very large part of media and financial interests is beating Nikos Androulakis and PASOK” because “some do not want Nikos Androulakis to become prime minister of the country. They do not want to become prime minister who does not control and come from the elite. They do not want to become a prime minister a new politician coming from the country’s region. It bothers them, “he said.
«So the center -left has a leader, it has a space that expresses it. I am sure how we will be able to persuade all of the social space of this line to come and support PASOK Because this is the only way to act political change, “he noted. He added that “as long as we have electoral fragmentation and parties, without simply being stated to get a share, then this will reinforce the longevity of New Democracy.” He then stressed that “whoever wants this New Democracy to leave and have a government that can change things and have a high competitive economy and a strong social state, the solution is PASOK and Nikos Androulakis.”
In the aftermath of yesterday’s court ruling for the Spartans, Mr Tsoukalas spoke of a “justification for the initiatives of PASOK and his candidates”. PASOK’s spokesman attributed government spokesman Pavlos Marinakis that he was in a hurry to talk about a majority change to the 149 MPs “. According to PASOK’s relevant press release, Mr. Tsoukalas “commented on a report by New Democracy MP Elias Brettakou on the panel that this will be judged by the Scientific Committee of the House, saying: ‘Mr Marinakis says about 149 and you say that They are not the same things. So, one of the two is wrong. I think Mr Marinakis is wrong. “
At the same time, Mr. Tsoukalas He described the replacement or not of the three Spartans as “an issue of institutional smoothness”. In view of the debate on the proposals for the establishment of a pre -trial committee on the Tempe tragedy, he said that “if the ND excludes a check on criminal acts and there is no new evidence, then every New Democracy MP personally will have the opportunity to be investigated and the case will not be investigated.”
“The proposal of the New Democracy says that Mr Karamanlis was intended to dismantle OSE and deprive him of resources. Do they believe? This will vote to be checked, “he commented. He noted that “the Bacaimi case file is referring to the officials, expressly saying that in addition to Ras it has proven that the Ministry of Transport had a supervisory responsibility for the safety of the railways. Otherwise it would not refer the General Managers. That is to say, the case file is denied the reasoning of the proposal of the New Democracy. ” She emphasized that PASOK therefore proposes something “perfectly compatible with the case file on which we worked methodically and consistently”, while “ND gave birth to a misdemeanor to get rid of it, one thing that no one has said in any testimony. Only the ND says it. ” According to PASOK’s press release, “New Democracy MP G. Brettakos interrupted the flow wondering if PASOK argues that Mr Karamanlis wanted to be dead,” with Mr Tsoukalas answering: “You obviously do not know that we did not know that if we did not know. But because you do not know the difference of homicide and disturbance, for your own protection, not to be exposed. “
The PASOK spokesman said that “Mr Bakaimis talks about the parallel responsibility of the Ministry and Ras, Mr Karamanlis says they had not informed him, while executives with protocolful documents claim that they did.” “Why not check all this in the pre -trial? The minister may say truth. The officials may be right. But they don’t even want to check, “he said.