“Shock of honesty, justice, democracy” considers Alexis Tsipras What Greece needs today to stop the continuing deterioration of the political system and institutions but also to have a leap forward, as it says in its first interview afterwards. his resignation.
Speaking to ‘Authors“, The former prime minister referring to his decision to give up the parliamentary status and privileges of the former prime minister He says that “the main motivation for my resignation to feel good with my consciousness.” And he adds: “I said no to the security of the professional politician to meet with the insecurity of the citizen.”
He described the framework that will go as follows: If we define the current political system, the fragmented democratic opposition, the IX parties and the parties born with the fetus of division and the ownership of parliamentary seats, which is well held- then the content of the movements I intend to do is very specific. No transaction, no background, no effort that reproduces worn practices. In the fountain of society, with confidence in the forces of the people -this is my decision. I may have lost my parliamentary privileges, but I am at least free to claim the privilege of moving along with many. I dare not say «like one of them». But yes, I would like to be with them «like one of them».
Tough in his criticism of the government and the prime minister he notes that “it is no longer going. The government has built a corruption regime with a prime minister who acts as an oligarch ”, while in terms of progressive opposition He notes that “the reconstruction of the progressive opposition is needed.”
As Mr Tsipras states, “its much -beaten form today, with enclosed and unreliable shapes, cannot play the role that the Constitution defines and society needs.”
For him SYRIZA He argues that “it was a life relationship, but it has closed”, while heralds the publication of the book’s title in the coming days.
Asked ‘what will be the continuity; New party, party- umbrella or electoral combinationSurrounded? And when? And supplementMattas: The Single Coalition of 1989-90 and the Multipurpose SYRIZA are models that canRun to operate andday;” replied:
First, to answer In the second leg of the questionof your, no model of yesterday cannot operatetoday, without at least the necessary large afterforms. «You can’t do the same revolution twice» a Spanish revolutionary used to say. But in your question about the Continue, I answer very clearly. «None of them. With an old passport no one is going to pass into the new era and will simply perpetuate regime stagnation and nonsense. I insist, I repeat, again, the political system, in all its expressions, has fallen into the consciousness of the people. Of at least the vast majority. The parties, the Righteousness, the House, the institutions, too. It is a delusion and a struggle to expect something positive from a system that does not want and cannot. We need new tools of thinking and action, otherwise we will all be swallowed in a dead end. Citizens – this is the power of change today. Only them, «below», can overturn data «up». To put their stamp on developments.
In this way, in this way, he identifies his own role by saying that “I have chosen the way out of the system in society in complete conscience, without any consultation with anyone. And I have no intention of reproducing tactics of “recruitment” or disintegration that all they can do is intensify the frustration of society. ” In the same direction, the “self -sufficiency and complacency of a self -sufficient Messiah, who recruits his students, is the last thing our homeland and society need today. Only the act of many can become a drive to progress, outside today’s toxic backpack. “
“I want to dedicate my energy to it. The time has come, we are delayed, for a great, bold, decisive renewal of practices, language, style, morality, but also faces, “the former prime minister observed, concluding that” it is time to change their perception of their perception. Yes, I believe, there must be an “invasion” of new morals and persons in politics. “