Given should be considered to submit a proposal pre -trial committee by the PASOK against Kostas Karamanlis and Christos Spirtz (any responsibilities if any have been limited) for the investigating any criminal liability about Tempi tragedy. According to information, after the opposition Officer studies the content of mass case file – information indicates that it is 1,100 pages – will file request for Establishment of a preliminary examination committee with the signatures only PASOK MPs. According to information, Harilaou Trikoupis executives believe that the responsibilities attributed to political persons are criminal.
For that and from the PASOK highlighton the basis of government spokesman’s statements that the Triantopoulos It may be a guide, that it matters what the case will do in this case the New Democracy government. They also point out that it should be clarified what he thinks and wishes Kostas Karamanlisas the government’s allegations were the Christos Triantopoulos who chose to be referred to ‘natural judge“That is to say, the Judicial Council, and the majority of the New Democracy appeared shortly afterwards to agree with this choice. “It is interesting if the same will apply to Mr Karamanlis“, They note his sources PASOK.
However, as it is, as in the previous two times, that is to say, the submission of a pre -trial request for contract 717 and the Kostas Karamanlis and the corresponding for the joke at the point of Tempi tragedy and Christos Triantopoulosthe PASOK will proceed on its own in submitting the request. Harilaou Trikoupi circles, as well as the spokesman Costas Tsoukalas himself, explain that once the PASOK has the 30 signatures of MPs required, will submit proposal alone for the formation of pre -trial. In this way they cut off every government’s attempt to re -identify PASOK with Freedom Cruisetalking again about ‘Mrs. Konstantopoulou’s tail »as she did in her case proposal. After all, as evidenced by developments, the condolences of PASOK by sailing freedom at parliamentary level cost politically to the opposition Officersomething they recognized with their statements and party executives.
To PASOK separate in fact the censure sentence, saying that it was a political initiative for which it was of great importance to seem that and other political parties agree By challenging the Mitsotakis government by the request for pre -trial committeeinsisting more on the legal-judicial dimension of this movement. “PASOK does not follow a rational A la card», As he did in Pre -trial for Mr. Triantopoulos. To motion of censure needed 50 Members worked with other partiesin the common finding that this government must leave, party players point out.
Specifically for the probability of recommendation pre -trial against Kostas KaramanlisHarilaou Trikoupi points out that must work as the constitution sets and that No one is nowhere to be that ‘The controller chooses how to check” Especially for the case of new case file where reached the Housethe spokesman of the press PASOK commented that ‘As leaks we will not have a finding but deposit sections” “Therefore there will be no fig sex to say the New Democracy that does not want to be called witnesses and to further details collected. Will therefore be deeply exposed If he attempts to insist on this process», (Triantopoulos model).