Political controversy over her case culminates Tempi tragedyas three different proposals were submitted to Parliament to set up a pre -trial committee: one by New Democracyone of the PASOK And a third, coming from the relatives of the victims and bears the signature of President Maria Karystianou.
This proposal is supported by 32 MPs from Greek solution, Win, her Cruiseas well as independent Members of Parliament in the Democracy Movement. The politicians targeted by eleven people, including the prime minister, as well as former Transport Ministers Costas Karamanlis and Christos Spirtzis.
The government’s reaction was immediate. Government spokesman Pavlos Marinakis spoke of a “vulgar exploitation” of national tragedy: “It is the absolute political downfall to talk about the ultimate betrayal in a tragic accident and to target the prime minister with undocumented charges. With relatives we will never come into conflict, but we will not allow them to be used as a shield. “
For its part, PASOK remains stable in its own proposal, citing that it is based on the criminal case, an element that, according to its executives, raises the greatest concern in New Democracy.
PASOK spokesman Costas Tsoukalas said: “In order to blame the prime minister, a special legal obligation under the Criminal Code must arise.”
Meanwhile, independent MPs affiliated with the Democracy Movement withdrew their signatures from SYRIZA’s proposal and joined the proposal of the relatives, which triggered Koumoundourou’s strong reaction.
The president of SYRIZA, Socrates Famellos, Comment: “It is not a serious attitude to sign and then withdraw the signature. SYRIZA remains stable in its serious position. “
From the KKE, parliamentary spokesman Nikos Karathanasopoulos spoke of “tragic signatures”, while Freedom Freight President Zoe Konstantopoulou argued: “The blocking of the House to carry out its research duties is a disturbance of the Democratic state.”
The president of the Democracy Movement, Stefanos Kasselakis, stressed: “Why does SYRIZA do not sign the accusation of families? There is no partnership with the far -right, it separates us abyss. “
Yesterday, the third proposal was officially submitted to the House, which activates the seven -day period in which thirty MPs can request referral of the case to the Three -Member Advisory Council for checking the accusations of the accusations.
There will be no plenary session until next Friday, and the procedures are expected to continue after June 13.
Three sentences – fourteen political persons
According to reports. The three proposals concern a total of fourteen political figures. For each of them there will be a separate ballot box – fourteen in total – four more than they had set up for the Novartis case.
The MPs will receive ballot papers stating the politician’s name, the ballot number and the legal rationale of the party, and will vote accordingly.
The date of discussion of proposals in plenary is expected to be decided in the coming days.