OR Expected decision or thought of Koumoundourou to Includes Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis in the proposal to set up a pre -trial committee about the case of Tempi is Act of political gravity. It is documented, according to its rapporteurs, from its institutional position as supervisory Prime Minister and Head of Ministers who managed the fate of the 717 Convention in question and the safety railways.
But according to Aristotelian methodology, where the principle of causality and consistency is decisive, reasonable questions are raised.
Reasoning first – The universality of responsibility:
If the political responsibility of a prime minister arises because of his status as a supreme supervisor, and if he may become a criminal auditor because his ministers have been involved in actions or omissions related to the accident,
The same should also apply to any prime minister whose minister is involved in these omissions.
Therefore, as long as the Christos Spirtzis – Minister of Infrastructure on SYRIZA – states publicly that calls for control of his own responsibilityby logical consequence must be put under consideration and The possible political or criminal responsibility of the then Prime Minister, namely Alexis Tsipras.
Reasoning Second – The Coherent Crisis of the Law:
If Koumoundourou invokes Article 86 In order to activate the procedures for criminal investigations of responsibilities, and if not only ministers but also the Prime Minister, then the ND frame, then the prime minister, then In order to maintain equal application of the law, the former prime minister cannot be excludedwhen he is already asking for his own minister to be checked.
Spirtzis was Minister of Infrastructure from 2016 to July 2019, and responsible for the evolution of the famous Convention 717. The fact that he is taking the initiative to activate Article 86 for himself, creates a historical prior political well -being and institutional resignation.
The conclusion:
If Spirtzis, as Ministerasks to be checked for acts and omissions Under Tsipras’ governance, and if Mitsotakis, as today’s prime minister, is put into the frame because he was the head of ministers with responsibility in Tempi, then logic, consistency and equality require the possible examination of Alexis Tsipras.
After all, Politics is not judged by the persons we want to excludebut from the faces we dare to include.