Out of the disciplinary plenary of Supreme Courtstayed in total 8 judges as they were fired due to abusive behavior, long delays and for health reasons.
In detail, judges fired by the disciplinary plenary of the Supreme Court is one Appeals of Appeals, one appellate, two presidents of the Court of First Instance and four first instance.
In terms of deputy prosecutorshe was fired on “continuously inappropriate out -of -service behavior that is incompatible with her office and affects the prestige of herself and justice”.
The deputy prosecutor and in the past had Disciplinary penalties for unjustified delays and inappropriate behavior.
According to the rapporteur Areopagite Evangelia Yakoumatou, the behavior of the deputy prosecutor is “incompatible with her function, testifies that she does not have a sense of her basic obligations as a prosecutor and deprived of her prosecutor and prosecutor”.
Disciplinary plenary concentrated on her abusive behavior and on the bumps he created in the apartment building in which he lived in the hive and especially for the parking spaces in the basement of the apartment building.
Yet, chairman was fired because of service failure which led to repeated disciplinary offenses and unjustified delays in performing its duties.
The delays were waving from two -digit to three -digit numbers (50,103,105, 115, etc.), while There were protests by lawyers for long delays.
The President of the Court of First Instance even ignored “the competent Supreme Court bodies, since despite their warnings of restricting its pending, it is indifferent to the execution of its duties, thereby manifesting itself and continuous service inadequate, with the consistency of the Theodorakopoulou.
Second President of the Court of First Instance was fired due to a large number of delays.
Indeed, the Court of First Instance he was serving had sent a document to the Chief of the Supreme Court Inspection requesting to deal with the matter, as “her behavior causes insurmountable difficulties in the proper functioning of the Court of First Instance”.
Areopagite Eleni Theodorakopoulou pointed out that the President of the Court of First Instance, ‘Is suffering parties and lawyers, who are rightly protesting, but also her service, refusing to comply with acts concerning it, so that its behavior as a judicial officer has adverse effects on the prestige of justice as an institution which, thus decreasing in a crucial and downside manner. “
First Instance was fired as by In 2013 to 2024 he repeatedly committed disciplinary offenses for unjustified delays.
More specifically, his delays rose to two -digit numbers, and 35 files were removed. Indeed, the Bar Association at its headquarters had sent a letter of protest to the Supreme Court’s president Ioanna Klapa.
According to Supreme Court Vice President Maria Koufoudi, “he is not aware of his basic obligations as a judicial officer and has been in a permanent stalemate for a long time, providing minimal judicial work, repeating his colleagues, who are consistent with their fellow citizens, They then find that their cases must be re -tried, even in the first instance, while suffering parties and lawyers who are protesting. “
Also, Areopagite Catherine Chondririzou in favor of dismissal of protagonist due to excessive and continuous delays, while 108 cases were deducted. In the same spirit of long delays, the redundancies of two more courts were reduced.
Finally, Appeal was fired for health reasons.