In the playoffs and playoffs Wreath In the established video with the analysis of the dietary decisions of this 3rd race in its games Super League.
From the controversial phases analyzed by Stefan Lanua there were no moments from the Olympic – AEK and Panathinaikos – PAOK derby, with the French archbishop considering that there is no reason to stand in a decision, considering good arbitrations.
This is how the … microscope came the games Panetolikos – Lamia and Panserraikos – Athens Kallithea.
Lanua’s analysis
About the penalty shootout by Panetolikos: “In this case the defender touches the ball by hand, and has made his body abnormally longer during a cross. Having his hands in this position, the player takes the risk of the ball to find in his hand and to be penalty. So we are waiting for a penalty and if the referee does not see it, VAR’s intervention. “
For Pasalides’ red: “A tackle that risks the opponent’s safety or has excessive power must be considered a serious foul. Here we have a tackle from behind with the right foot stretched, the plugs on the ankle of the opponent and at high speed. We are waiting for a red card and VAR intervention, as it did, to eliminate the player who made the serious foul. “
About the penalty shoot -out by Panserraikos: “Here the attacker is in front of his opponent, in the big area of the opponent. The defender at the same time fouls in the upper and lower part of his opponent’s body. We are waiting for a penalty shootout in this case. “