The video was released with the commentary of the controversial phases of the Super League matches, with him Wreath Analyze dietary decisions of the 4th Super League match and – among other things – to deal with the penalty shootout by the Olympic In the derby with Panathinaikos, in the Cambelle phase with TETE on Avenue.
Stefan Lanua stressed that there had to be intervention by VAR and a penalty shootout in favor of Olympiacos and Kabela.
At the same time, AEK’s first canceled goal at AEL’s headquarters stressed that it was properly canceled and the referee should not have been on-field review. Stefan Lanua, however, does not even comment on the phase in which the Union is calling for Pantelakis’ miscarriage in the hard mark on Jovic.
Still, Stefan Lanua stresses that Panetolikos ‘goal in Toumpa was properly canceled, as was Christogeorgos’ red. Also, for Kifissia – Aris, he says that the yellow was a penalty shootout, but the typical home side was wrongly canceled for Tettei’s hand.
Stefan Lanua spoke …
For the Cambelle Phase – Tete: “In this case the referee charged an indirect foul and showed a yellow card. It is certainly not a theater because the attacker tries to get through two players without seeking contact to fool the referee.
Because it is a difficult phase we are expecting VAR intervention as the Panathinaikos player with No10 fouls first with his left foot and then with the right who is not on the ground. The Commission is waiting for VAR intervention and a penalty shoot -out. “
For AEK’s first canceled goal: “It is a violation if a player scores in the opponent by hand either directly or later the phase even inadvertently. In this case the referee does not need to see the phase, because it is an objective decision (based on the facts).”
For the canceled goal of Kifissia: “Compared to the previous incident, he is not the same player who scores after an unintentional touch of the ball by hand by his teammate. This hand is not punished and had to count, in accordance with the proper application of the rules of the game.”
For the penalty shootout by Mars: “In this case during the cross, Pantelidis holds his opponent. He does not attempt to play the ball only to block the opponent. We expect VAR’s penalty and intervention if the referee loses the phase.”
For the red in Christogeorgos: “In this case, the goalkeeper out of the area touched the ball with his hand to prevent an obvious opportunity for the attacker’s goal. We expect, as it did, the referee showing a red card for a denial of obvious goal.”
For the canceled goal of Panetolikos: “At the beginning of the attack the Panetolikos player fouls, pressing his opponent and then his team scores. With VAR’s intervention the referee canceled the goal for a pure foul at the beginning of the attack.”