Sharp was his source response Municipality of Athens to the Minister of Tourism Olga Kefalogiannis who made severe criticism of the Harry Duke For the graffiti against Israel and Israeli citizens on the streets of Athens and accused him of having “cheap propaganda” instead of taking responsibility.
Its sources Kotzia Square They refer to a “unexpected and abusive statement by the Minister of Tourism” in which “it is not worth answering”. The same sources, however, leave the government’s coordinated attack on the mayor.
“The 3 ministers have become 4. We expect the next one, as everything seems to be at the time,” they note meaningfully.
“We will continue to strive to improve the lives of Athens citizens,” the sources conclude.
“It is enough in constant conflicts, away from his duties”
The source comment came in the context of the confrontation between the two sides, which began Monday afternoon on the issue of graffiti against Israel and the citizens.
In her latest announcement, Mrs. Kefalogianni He charged to K. Duke that it had an “anti -disposal tone and inappropriate way” and that “he dares to answer the essence of the issue”.
After noting that her letter concerned “a serious issue, affecting the image of the capital” and “closed with two clear positions: the need for cooperation and the common goal of a safe, democratic and hospitable Athens”, notes for the Mayor of Athens that “he is” suffering from him. Instead of taking responsibility for him, he decided to cheap propaganda, which is incompatible with the seriousness of his institutional role. “
“Athens cannot become a city of fear and abusive slogans. It should not be identified with racism, anti -Semitism and intolerance. It must be and remain an open, safe and democratic city that respects its visitors and values of our country. Let us all take over our responsibilities, ”the Minister of Tourism concludes in her statement.
The whole announcement of the Minister of Tourism for Harry Doukas
No answer to Athens
The response to the social media of the Mayor of Athens, Mr. Haris Doukas, is a unpleasant surprise. Not only for the unprecedented anti -disgusting tone and the inappropriate way, but mainly because it dares to answer the essence of the issue.
Our letter concerned a serious subject, affecting the image of the capital. And it closed with two clear positions: the need for cooperation and the common goal of a safe, democratic and hospitable Athens. Unfortunately, Mr. Doukas refused both. Because it just seems to be neither the problem nor its solution.
On the contrary, he is suffering from constant conflicts, away from his duties. Instead of taking responsibility for him, he decided to cheap propaganda, which is incompatible with the seriousness of his institutional role.