And it seems that it worked – almost no misinformation was released on the Pope’s health, according to Benjamin Sultz.
“I think it worked to some extent. I didn’t see anything that is conspiracy or misleading about his health, “he said.
“I can’t think of another example where twice a day, a leader’s type team to give a press conference. But I think it’s a good plan, “he added.
The 2017the Vatican was forced to deny that the former Pope Benedict XVI was one step after death after spreading rumors of his health on social media. Reports argued that former Pope’s personal secretary, Georg Ganswein, had described the former leader of the Catholic Church as “a candle that erases slowly”.
Pope Francis, who had previously became an objective of misinformation produced through AIhe had sounded the alarm for fake news and false images and videos – particularly emphasizing how they contribute and exacerbate what he called “a crisis of truth”.
Last January, the Pope wrote a message to the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, calling on political, economic and business leaders to exercise strict control over the development and implementation of artificial intelligence technologies.
“Artificial intelligence can now produce results that are almost indiscriminate from human labor,” Pope Francis warned, “posing serious questions about its influence on public debate and the erosion of truth.”
OR turn to the Vatican’s communication strategy It raises a crucial question that concerns not only the Church but also the wider information society:
At a time when misinformation is spreading rapidly and the landscape of social media is constantly changing, is transparency in ultimately the most effective defense against conspiracy theories and fake news?
Perhaps the constant and open flow of formal information may ultimately prove to be more powerful than any denying afterwards, restoring trust and limiting the ground where false narratives bloom.
Source link