The majority is expected to deposit its findings in the day in the day Pre -trial against him Christos Triantopoulos for the case of Temps. Reportedly, ND MPs will support the criminal prosecution of the former deputy minister for the offense of breach of duty.
According to the same information, what will be emphasized is that the investigative material by the Larissa Public Prosecutor’s Office – including 30 witness testimonies and this material has reached the House – for the prosecution, in combination with the will of the former minister and the former ministerial minister, is considered sufficient.
For their part, opposition parties denounce the majority and premature closure of pre -trial investigation, but also the fact that it did not do substantial research, testimonies of witnesses and examining documents.
More specifically, PASOK calls for a criminal prosecution against former Deputy Minister Christos Triantopoulou for the offense of breach of duty, with the concluding report submitted to the Bureau of the House Pre -Trial Committee. At the same time, the text signed by SYRIZA, a new left and independent MP Athena Linou denounces the procedure followed as unconstitutional and thus preferred the failure to vote for the proposal for prosecution against the former Deputy Minister.
The KKE says it will not draw conclusions, so as not to legalize the process. And the process followed by the majority of the pre -trial, but also the content of the original proposal that PASOK had submitted, NIKI complained.
More specifically, the report submitted by PASOK MPs Milena Apostolakis, Evangelia Liakoulis and Giorgos Moulkiotis proposes:
– Criminal prosecution against the former deputy minister under the Prime Minister Christos Triantopoulos for the offense of breach of duty during the period between 3.3.2023 and 6.3.2023.
– Continue by the competent judicial authorities to legally investigate any other offenses committed by Mr Christos Triantopoulos or other political or non -political persons.
At the same time, PASOK argues that the constitutional process was overcome. “With the sole responsibility of the government majority of the New Democracy, the pre -trial committee did not conduct the Constitution and the law, it did not perform its prosecutors, did not investigate the case, did not examine the case, and did not examine it.”
The additional points of PASOK’s exhibition are as follows:
“The approach of the government majority to complete the committee’s work without any substantial investigation of the possible offenses performed is a conscious choice of political feasibility, concealment and a blatant violation and circumvention of the constitution itself,
· This approach has the immediate effect of being a formal prosecution only for the misdemeanor of the breach of duty without the possibility of expanding other, possibly heavier, offenses that may have been committed by Mr. Christos Triantopoulos or other politicians.
· The Constitution, as it is today, leaves no room for selection, but imposes specific procedures, without giving the Minister the opportunity to determine the stages of investigating his responsibilities himself, as Mr Triantopoulos attempted to do through his letter. The guaranteed responsibilities of the preliminary investigation, such as a preliminary examination, constitute both a procedural and a substantive condition for the drafting of a reasoned finding, as provided by law. Moreover, since new evidence had emerged, later on both the case file formed before the Public Prosecutor’s Office of Larissa and the PASOK Movement for the establishment of the Commission. Among other things, we are referring to the finding of EPANAAM, which confirms the alteration of the tragedy of the tragedy in the first few days after the accident and the loss of critical evidence but also to Mr Triantopoulos’ email to other government officials.
· If the majority of the government considers that Mr Triantopoulos bears no criminal liability for his acts or omissions and, however, decides to prosecute him, then beyond the obvious paradox and contradiction of the decision, the decision is raised and raised by the Government. abuse of power.
For the controversial meeting of 3 March 2023
· There is serious evidence from the case file that the “informal meeting” of March 3, 2023, in the presence of the Deputy Minister under the Prime Minister Chr. Triantopoulos, as well as a scale of government agents, two days after the tragedy, is the opening event of the unfair intervention in the area of accident and alteration. The pretext only for this illegal intervention was used the need to restore the train traffic, which was not carried out for about another month (on 29.3.2023) and regardless of the deterioration of the site, which had been completed within a few hours, on 4.3.2023, resulting in the disappearance of critical evidence.
· At the expense of the other participants in this “meeting” the prosecution was ordered by the Prosecutor of Appeals of Larissa, with the exception of Mr Triantopoulos, for whom the prosecutor was deprived of relevant competence in view of Article 86 p.
What do SYRIZA, New Left and Linen denounce
For their part, SYRIZA, New Left and Athena Linou speak of “clear bias of the majority during the work of the Special Parliamentary Committee”
Among other things, they say that by a majority decision:
(a) No witnesses were called in order to further examine the experts and technical advisers of the victims’ families, service and political persons.
(b) The request of the minority members was not accepted to submit the copies of the case file as a whole, so that all the necessary documents can be taken into account.
(c) The request for an opinion of the Scientific Committee of the House was not accepted, whose prestige is not disputed, on the procedure followed. This is despite the fact that the chairman of the committee had asked for the scientific committee on other minor issues. It should be noted that the request under the responsibility of the Chairman of the Preliminary Inquiry Committee, was not even arbitrarily put to the vote, indicative of the majority of the majority to complete the preliminary examination procedure.
(d) The 100 words of the suspect of the suspect of the crime of the breach of duty (Article 259 CC) was accepted during the period between 3-3-2023 and 6-3-2023, by the former Deputy Minister of Prime Minister Christos Triantopoulos.
(e) The direct referral of the Deputy Minister of State is requested by the Prime Minister, Triantopoulos Christos to the Five -Member Judicial Council, without conducting a preliminary examination in accordance with the law.
(f) At the meeting of March 28, 2025, April 4 was appointed as a date of submission of the conclusion of all parties.
Concluding, they say that “the members of the committee we sign here are refusing to legitimize the procedure, which was followed by a majority decision” and complain that the majority “violates the Constitution (Article 86), violates the law on the responsibility of Ministers (Law 3126/03) Fundamental principles of criminal procedure, he chooses, bypassing Parliament, to overtake the first and foremost stage of the preliminary, raising issues of invalidity of the pre -trial, as the constitutionally planned procedure for the preliminary examination has not been observed during the preliminary examination, To avoid in every way, to find himself as a witness, the head of the former Deputy Minister rather than the Prime Minister, apologizing for the crime of concealment. The ND created a polarization climate and sparked a fault in the institutional functioning of the House, refusing to allow the Commission to perform its essential role in attributing responsibilities to real culprits as high as they are. “
“Parody” says the KKE
“Parody” characterizes the KKE the pre -trial committee for Christos Triantopoulos. “The KKE is not going to legitimize, with the filing of a finding, a pre-trial pre-trial committee that is yet another incident in the concealment operation by the ND government and the parliamentary majority,” the KKE MPs, members of the Commission, Nikos Karatos.
“This operation was confirmed by the convenient proposal for its establishment by PASOK, which limited the prosecution only to Chr. Triantopoulos and only for breach of duty, by the government’s majority approaching to the closure of her work by utilizing Triantopoulos’ letter to half a page she filed without appearing, “the two KKE MPs said,” Distressing the place of crime, for which not only Chr. Triantopoulos and possible other members of the government, but the prime minister is also responsible as his political boss. “
“And of course it is necessary to investigate all of them not only for breach of duty, but also for the care-distribution of justice, as the KKE has already shown. Above all, however, whatever the government does, it will not be rinsed out of its huge responsibilities for the main, the prescribed crime of the frontal conflict of trains due to the lack of security measures and the consequent explosion with 57 dead and dozens of injuries.
And they continue: “The evidence is boasting that this crime has enormous political and criminal responsibilities not only by the current government, but also the previous and in particular the Ministers of Transport for a felony disturbance of the security of transporting steady track, homicide and exposure to thousands of people. Whatever the government does, as well as the other parties that have ruled and supporting this policy, their responsibilities are not limited to, despite the favorable criminal framework for the members of the government who have co -ordinated. Nor will they be able to acquit the Great Guilty: the system of profit that sacrifices human life on the altar of a road that constantly gives rise to Tempi, in Mati, in Mandra, in the workplaces and prepares the new Tempi of the War. “
Concluding, they say: “The organized labor-populist movement with its struggle against this system, governments and state can impose punishment of all the perpetrators, no matter how high they are.”