The criminal prosecution of the former deputy minister Christos Triantopoulos on the offense of breach of duty and referring to Judicial council Asks for the findings submitted by her Members New Democracy In her bureau pre -trial.
According to his information protothema.gr The conclusions chapter states that: “A preliminary examination has already been conducted by the Public Prosecutor’s Office of Larissa and issued No. 43/2024 Public Prosecutor’s Office, which archived the reports of a series of non -political persons and forwarding the file to the House of Representatives. Larissa was prosecuted on 4 natural persons.
The concentrated evidencementioned in this It is considered to be absolutely sufficient material for the Commission to end up, assessing that the conditions required by law at this stage to propose the plenary to the plenary of the criminal prosecution and that Mr Triantopoulou’s own appearance is not necessary. To provide clarification, since it was already summoned to provide explanations, a call to which it responded.
The Commission therefore considers that the concentrated material and thoughts developed in the prosecutor’s provision are sufficient and does not need to do other acts.
Consequently, the facts described in the Public Prosecutor’s Order and led to their legal affiliation, as stated in the provision and led to the criminal prosecution of the 4 natural persons in exactly the same way that they constitute the evidence required by law and for criminal prosecution.
The Commission concludes the highest conclusion regardless of his will to be led to the natural judge as soon as possible. Regardless of this, the Commission proposes the criminal prosecution for the offense of breach of duty (No. 259 CC) solely from the concentrate evidence and prosecution issued. We therefore propose the criminal prosecution for the offense of Article 259 CC referring to the facts and their legal affiliation as described in number number. 43/2024 and 69/2024 Public Prosecutors ยป.