POMIDA: uncontrolled bonus and to those who “fascinate” owners and damage the State

Uncontrolled bonus payment to the “Batches”, even if they did not pay any rent at the owner In the previous year, it clearly provides Article 70 of the bill that has reached public consultation until 19.6.2025, since it is sufficient to report the number of Real Estate Real Estate Information Statement in the tax return of the tenant (10.6.20). Pomida.

POMIDA in its announcement calls for it to cross the landlord’s tax return automatically that the taxation of the rents of the previous year has not been postponed as unpaid, as an incentive to limit the loss of rent by the landlords who will help them open their “closed homes” cancellation, taxation of unpaid rentals.

Specifically, as Pomida states, Article 70 (5) of the Law of the Ministry of Culture is provided that: “The calculation of the aid shall be made without request, based on the details of the annual income tax return of the lessee of the previous tax year, as the last tax year.”

Consequently, the rent subsidy in accordance with the above provision will be paid generously and galantoma each year by the taxpayers’ money, without any intersection with the tax return of the owner, since the provision in subparagraph 1 is quoted by the sum of it.

This will result in that each year, a number of “batches” will receive from the state in their bank account the amount of a rent even if they did not pay any rent to the landlord in the previous year, only to properly declare the lease declaration number.

Thus a useful social measure, Pomida says, will also result in an outrageous unethical reward of some “batachs”, who may have been able to leave with postponements and other procedurals to leave even all the rents of the year, Revenue from the postponement of taxation of unpaid rents, to subsidize their illegal and antisocial behavior, giving them all that all tenants who have made efforts to be consistent in their obligations will receive.

It should be noted here that, despite our continued memorandums to the relevant ministries, unfortunately the same is true of the rent allowance, which since 2016 is paid to the tenants without them, in many cases, paying the rent to the landlords, so that it will not be fulfilled, without any purpose being fulfilled, without any purpose. the closed houses.

That is why POMIDA states, we consider it self -evident and absolutely necessary to add a subparagraph under (c) in paragraph 6 of Article 70 of the bill that defines as a prerequisite for the aid and not to have been accepted by the AADE, the landlord’s request for delaying taxpayer him, so that paragraph 6 is as follows: Article 70, paragraph 6 of the Consultation of a bill

Subsidy in the form of a refund of rent

A prerequisite for granting the aid is:

  1. to have been submitted to AADE, within the deadline or out of time until the fifteenth (15th) day of July of the year of payment of the aid, the relevant declaration of real estate leasing information and, and,
  2. have stated the number of the declaration of c. (a) in the income tax return of the previous year of the lessee
  3. It has not been accepted by AADE. The landlord’s request for postponing leases taxation of the previous year not paid by the lessee.

Source link

Leave a Comment