Higher tones in central political confrontation with the government and New Democracy has requested Paul Polakis In his placement in the Central Committeewhile in mild tones he deposited the His disagreement with the abolition of “voters of the two” that Socrates Famellos announced. On the other hand, he welcomed the positions and even thanked the position Committee because he found himself, included his own proposals from his program.
In particular, in relation to the style of opposition exercise, he noted ‘He doesn’t want caresses, he wants war“And how”It matters not only what we say, but also how we say it».
Polakis: Guilty for slanderous defamation – 12 -month imprisonment sentence (video)
‘We let them play ball’
In fact, he noted that what the government has done 2025-19 and not the SYRIZA to allow the assimilation of responsibilities with the ND, especially in the implementation of Convention 717. “We let them play ball“He said.
Chania MP, in his placement defended the Christos Spirtz And he criticized Vasilis Kokkalas for a proposal that made publicly suspended a property, commenting on that “This is a great wound of spaceThat is, not to support his people.
“Organized plan of the government to hand over plots to individuals”
Referring to Presidential Decree on Construction in Areas Under 2,000 inhabitants, P. Polakis talked about a organized plan of government to hand over plots to individuals. He warned ‘not to start pseudo -culture“, Asking for a virtually harsh attitude.
Also commented on the proclamation of lawsuit by the Truthagainst Socrates Famellou, saying that this is a “unprecedented threat” to a party president. He spoke of a “state” and accused the government of suffocating the leadership of justice.
Finally, in terms of Statute and the Famellou proposal To abolish the two -dimensional members and the electoral list to close before the day of the election procedure, Pavlos Polakis disagreed, saying that the president should gather social acceptance and that steps should not be taken backwards. “In such a case they would not have voted 70 but 25,000,” he said.