Polakis attack on Famello: We’re not doing well, which PASOK will we ally?

Attack on the president of SYRIZA PS, Socrates fired from her step Central Committeef of party Paul Polakis. «It hurts me to admit it, but we’re not doing well and that’s what I think is something that most here, we recognize it“He said, while in the face of progressive partnerships,”fight through SYRIZA Because I believe it is the only “vehicle” that is capable of bringing us one day to power again. Clean things !!! What else is said or written has no basis“, He made it clear.

Characterizing ‘Problematic’ the intra -party operation, ‘How many times has the JU has met in recent months in the same ineffective way?»He questioned and found that ‘There is a serious problem in the operation of the organization and specifically in its 5 -member secretariat and this is something like a common secret». “I have the impression that any temporary solution is planned to be given again without informing the JU and without approved any changes. This is not acceptable». «I call the president to take a clear position today“He said.

Still criticized the return of the George Vassiliadis and Christos Spirtz to Political Secretariat, noting that the situation ‘was overflowed so that the Temponera In the PG and the Jumac in a position in the PG in which he was not elected as he occupied Spirtz’s position when he resigned». «I say well, the more the better, but they should return as simple members to their organizations. Personally, from the beginning I demanded the expansion of the PG so as to reflect the data as created after the presidential election. Instead we saw in violation of the Articles of Association, additions to members without even a decision of the CC“, He noted.

From the shots did not escape and the Alekos Flambouraris, as’In the case of the Poulazas Institute and the chairman’s choices for the position of Chairman of the Board of Directors and the Director of the Scientific Council (I am talking about Flambouraris and Repoussi), we had a simple information to the PG without any vote. We do not seem to have understood the wrong tactics of the past. The Poulazas Institute, which is funded through SYRIZA, I think that it should be thoroughly reorganized so that it can be the vehicle in order to re -ground with the left -wing intellect and university in general, which were once for us. Instead I have the impression that we are wasting this chapter in order to do “party diplomacy”“, Mr. Polakis emphasized.

Equally sharp there was also about the opening of the progressive parties and the cooperation of PASOK, observing that “Slowly but steadily, citizens seem to realize that PASOK is a crutch of Mitsotakis and the system, and this is the only reason that still survives in double -digit rates as it may need to be needed in the near future to contribute to the system balance.».

«In this political context, we suddenly read about the intervention of the President in DNEWS that states that “our proposal includes parliamentary co -operation, a political dialogue forum and social cooperation” as well as that “the ultimate goal is in the next elections, and in my opinion before them there will be a ballot paper and a ballot paper.”

This is really a move without prior to the history of the party. With no discussion on the bodies, without the issue of the Centur, the SYRIZA president is publicly talking about the creation of a new body, even announcing that he will contribute to SYRIZA’s autonomous elections in the elections.Mr. Polakis argued.

«And I ask you, with what PASOK will we ally with comrades and comrades?

With what the Rearm Europe program considers as a first step and asking for additional funds or with any other fantasy PASOK? What does it want to abolish Article 16 or the rest? He questioned to conclude that “what society needs is not to fall for Mitsotakis as a person, but the ND policies. Is there at least one or one in this room that thinks this can happen with the creation of a common carrier with PASOK’s Androulakis? If there is, let’s raise his hand at the moment to see himE.

«Will you tell me, Paul, the coincidence of the so -called progressive forces comes from society itself, how can we not respond? I will agree with you, where I do not back down is that the rules come in from us and coincidence without specific basic programmatic commitments can not exist with anyone.

Now beyond PASOK If I had to comment on the rest of the hearing, I would say that:

1. By sailing freedom I agree that it is rather impossible to find common points. On what basis will we discuss with the life that turned around Greece by spending on the Prespa Agreement and arguing about how it can be canceled? Unfortunately, life, a legal way for social justice and the overthrow of the sovereign neoliberal policies. After all, we do not want to sue the system, to overthrow it.

2. As far as NAP and our former comrades are concerned, I will not hide. I’ll talk openly. The key question in my opinion is whether we are talking about a summit or whether we are talking about executives, few or many who want to return. If we are talking about a summit that includes, among other things, negotiation for seats and Officers, thanks I will not get. The last thing we need is the return of a mechanism to the party, which so much cost us. If we are talking about a selfless and without conditions of return of members, then we forgive them for the big one to leave by holding their seats and welcome.

In any case, it is to be done, it must be open, democratically, as provided by our statutes and without agreements under the table“, He concluded.

Source link

Leave a Comment