“Where is Mr. Androulakis? Shouldn’t he go out and talk? “
‘The finding of the NTUA, the Karoni finding, is the second official finding of the judicial authority, that is, the one ordered by the Special Reserve Investigator on the Tempi case. It is not a “a” finding. All findings have their value. I do not discredit any scientist. The Tempe case, in order for people to understand, has two official findings. The first, which had come out in 2023 and was not talking about flammable materials or anything, and after some victims, as they were entitled to, and challenged the findings of the first finding, was ordered the second official judicial expertise and what we had … So, to understand the order of things a little:“The government spokesman stressed Paul Marinakis In an interview with Parapolitika 90.1.
He pointed out that the Karoni finding says what the first finding had said, that the explosion with strong probability, without any other possibility, comes from silicone oils. “So, for the politician, it is possible that there is a smuggler who carries some flammable material, so there is no reason to conceal, so there is no reason to conceal. Not to forget in which country we live in, for three months we were not accused of bad handling before Tempi, we had all admitted it, with the accident, we had taken on political responsibility and criminal responsibility is being investigated. We were accused of covering up, “he said.
Mr. Marinakis, answering a question about the prime minister’s statements, said: “Kyriakos Mitsotakis, as he should, since the first, official, finding was challenged by relatives and we were waiting for the second finding – and last year to Mr. Papadakis and Mrs. Anastasopoulou, and this year to Mr. Schroeder Justice ”. The prime minister’s interview with Mr. Theodorakis, when he was, had not questioned the first official finding of justice on the reason for the explosion. With the question of the first, the two interviews given by the Prime Minister on this issue and in many other positions – and to Mr. Papadakis a year ago and to Mr. Schroeder, about two months ago – he had left it open, because so he had to do and said he would find it.
“On the contrary, Mr. Androulakis, while presenting the conclusion of EPANAAM, appeared on a television station – do not forget them – the day before the big rally, in order to anger society above and converted – please, this is the crucial – a probability of EPAAAM. He did not expect the Technical University, justice, and announced the leading parliamentary tool, the proposal of mistrust to throw the government. The difference is chaotic. One, Mitsotakis, is waiting for the official experts to rule and justice – and does well, does not take a position – the other, Mr. Androulakis, the leader of the opposition, heralds a proposal of mistrust over a possibility. So, I insist on what I said yesterday. Yesterday the NTUA finding, the official finding of justice, and we have a 24 -hour apathy by Mr. Androulakis. Where was Mr. Androulakis lost who in other cases was coming on television? Where is Mr. Androulakis? Shouldn’t he go out and talk? He is the leader of the opposition, ”he added.
“For SYRIZA, the navigation of freedom and the Greek solution, we did not fall from the clouds. We didn’t expect anything else. The truth is that by linking the death of a man with the government, through questions, I am referring to Mr Famello, there I am surprised. But for the rest of all these parties, we didn’t fall from the clouds. But for PASOK it is true that we were “disappointed”. Why were we disappointed? You know that I am from a young age in the New Democracy. But the truth is that PASOK of previous years was a party that, despite our many disagreements and many political differences, stood at the height of the Great and contributed with the ND to keeping our country in Europe and being able to have vaccines, we can have money for all the pandemic and all the money.. Mr. Androulakis’ PASOK, unfortunately, has collapsed and contributed to the most extreme voices of populism. That’s what the story wroteMr. Marinakis stressed.
“The only thing that is worth this debate from the Karoni finding is that the credibility of the opposition has been irreparably shaken. So, as you realize, they have a very small, minimal, credibility of what they said, based on their attitude, which was denied in the past months, in relation to the other issue of the explosion.“Mr Marinakis said, stressing that their credibility is in the nadir.
He also said that ND believes in Triantopoulos’ innocence, but justice will say what the truth is.
In addition, he emphasized that the argument used by the opposition, that because an existing one is accused of a felony, his boss must also, in this case, Mr Karamanlis or someone else, after all Minister or Deputy Minister, be charged again, nor lawful. “They are outside of any legal or common sense. I say this because every natural person, whether he is a minister, you are a Minister, a Secretary -General, or an employee, is evaluated separately on the basis of the facts that concern this person alone. There is no responsibility of hierarchy itself alone, ”he said.
On whether a letter of Karamanlis should be preceded by that of Mr Triantopoulos, the government spokesman said: “This has to do with the defendant. What I say, to become clear, “Triantopoulos model” means ending. That is, every former minister, deputy minister, who is to refer to something specific, must go to the natural judge. The ending is the “Triantopoulos model”. That is, the referral to the natural judge and not through the suffering of the parties’ filter and the subjective criterion. Now, technically, each case is special, let’s see when that time comes. And of course every person chooses to do what they consider right. “