In the fact that the president of the Athens Bar Association and the Plenary of the Bar Associations, Dimitris Vervesos, Knowing the contents of the Anastasiou Ded Expertise Reportwhich rejected all the conspiracy theories for fireplace, which was formed shortly after the trains in Tempe, the government spokesman reported during the information of political editors. Paul Marinakis.
Pavlos Marinakis commented that, right yesterday, the president of the Athens Bar Association said in an interview yesterday, that while he knew the truth, because of his capacity, he did not share it, but accused him that, while he knew, he was expressing public views.
“What Mr Vervesos said in his latest interview, I think they had a very right basis, they also had institutionality we had missed. The president of the SAA cannot do politics, but it is not what Mr Vervesos has said in recent weeks. Chose to leave the limits of his institutional property. He expressed views, positions. I have seen several interviews. Top one in Kontra Channel that He has talked about concealment, silicone oils, blames the prime minister, has talked about jerk with the purpose of masking. He did not speak as an institutional factor of the country as he owed and say that justice would say everything, “said Pavlos Marinakis.
“What I am saying has nothing to do with the other members of the SAA who did not make politics in the name of their property. Mr Vervesos has chosen to have a political stance and be part of the wider effort to tool an accident, “he said.
The government spokesman noted, referring to Mr Vervesos’ words, that “it was not the real picture he had. When you formulate opinion and judgments, it is not a crisis, it is a serious category. How serious, to say all this while you know the truth? While there is an expertise that says the opposite of what you say? How reliable are you when you hide the truth? “
Floridis: We expect answers
The Minister of Justice was asked about the issue this morning, and the Minister of Justice, George Floridisand replied, “There is an issue concerning Mr Vervesos who is not just a lawyer. We expect answers from him as the President of the Plenary of the Bar Associations and the plenary itself. “
According to Mr Floridis, Mr Vervesos’ explanations “will appear to be political to deal with it”, noting that “I do not remember having a show to support the Eye accusation”.
“There is an issue that has been publicly raised. If applicable, there is an issue that concerns the whole of the country’s law firm. If applicable it is very serious. There is a matter of major political and ethical class. The Bar Body, because it concerns its entirety, has to answer. “
Glomex Player(eexbs1jkdkewvzn, v-d8wr833zcnyx)
Vervesos: I could not give it because of the secret of the pre -trial
In assumption that he was aware of the content of an Anastasiou Ded Exposure Exhibitionwhich rejected all the conspiracy theories for fireplace, which was formed immediately after the train collisions in TempiThe President of the Athens Bar Association and the Plenary of the Bar Associations made a statement yesterday. Dimitris Vervesoswho cited as an argument for the fact that she “buried her” The fact that the pre -trial pre -trial is secret.
“All the findings that took place at that time, late 2023-2024, and England for Plakias and the experts designated by Mr Bakaimis (ed. The investigator investigating the Tempe case) in the first phase and the finding of our own. Vervesos on Wednesday night on One Channel.
“So everyone had and worked a model with silicone oils. The latest evidence emerged after EPASAM and Ghent came out and spoke that there could be aromatic hydrocarbons. The data that existed in 2024 and the studies led to that conclusion. We had never drawn our attention to what happened afterwards. The finding was based on the State General Chemistry, the WEU and the Fire Brigade and says that on the basis of the data I have led to silicone oils, “Mr Vervesos continued.
Glomex Player(eexbs1jkdkewvzn, v-d8wh9k04rf4h)
Asked why he did not give publicity the finding This, Mr. Vervesos replied, “Is the pre -trial proceedings, I have the deposits, to start taking them a photocopy? I can’t go out and take the case file ride. I am a lawyer and I have to comply with the pre -trial. Do you know how much I know from deposits? I can’t give a finding that is secret. Wasn’t Mitsotakis’s finding out of England of Plakias, Mitsotakis, Mitsotakis said about silicone oils? They overturned the silicone oils from the conclusion of EPANAAM and Ghent. There were no aromatic hydrocarbons until that time. “
“I have the whole case file in my hands, I can’t release it. We had focused on 717’s causal relationship with derailment. If there is another issue with this fireplace with this fireplace, it has come from EPANAAM, “Mr Vervesos argued.
In the observation of his interlocutor, George Mouroutis, that “all the logic of concealment was based on fireplace” and the question “if you should contribute to public dialogue in order to protect from rhetorical hatred?” Dimitris Vervesos He replied, “If we have received material from the scene of the accident and we have gone further and it has not been found in if there was wood, there was the concealment. We focused there our criticism that the space should not be to be disturbed. I have talked about fireplace and how it came out. The report was on the basis of the State General Chemistry, the prime minister said, afterwards it turned out to be something else. “
To the question, finally, if he would release the finding if he had inverted content, Mr Vervesos did not respond and said only “we would not come out then the fireplace, if the state gave us any other elements we would say it”.
After the disclosure of the Dede ReportTwitter account Georghy Zhukov made the following:
The report, which published the First Issue, just has a peculiarity as revealed by lawyer D. Gallis. It is the same expert that has been appointed by the plenary session of the country’s Bar Associations.
Read what means SYRE AND BAZODA: https://t.co/p6vNErVhmy pic.twitter.com/l08nIXmfAv— Georghy Zhukov (@GeorghyZhukov) April 2, 2025
Dimitris French, referring to the post, is a former lawyer for relatives of the tragedy in Tempe.
The Plenary of Lawyers for the Dede Report
The plenary of the Bar Associations noted, inter alia, in its memorandum to the investigator on February 28, 2024:
Mr Investigations,
The country’s Bar Associations are standing up to your serious, complex and difficult task. Unfortunately, the reasonable time of the research is at its limits after a year from the accident.
In the context of this assistance and to assist your difficult and complex work, the plenary session of the Presidents of the Greek Bar Associations appointed Special Experts Mr. Anastasios Ch. of 28.02.2023. The above -mentioned expert has compiled a January 2024 “Technical Advisor Exhibition”, which we present to you today, in which in a detailed, objective and scientific manner analyzes the conditions of the Tempe’s accident and concludes with specific conclusions that will help the facts of Justice.
Announcement of the SAA
Announcement on the issue was issued on Thursday afternoon by the Athens Bar Association, which states, inter alia, that ‘We are not falling from attacks’. The announcement follows:
The Board of Directors of the Athens Bar Association, on the occasion of reports that have seen the light of publicity in relation to the attitude of the President of the Athens Bar Association on the Tempe case, issued the following announcement:
It is obvious that the targeted attack on the Athens Bar Association and its president is due to our continued actions and interventions for the unfair imputed taxation of freelancers, the conditions of justice, the rule of law, the espionage, the functioning of the independent authorities, the protection of the independent authorities.
The Athens Bar Association, as it was, by law, entitled a statement to support the charge in the Crime Crime, seeking to complete the truth and the rendering of justice.
In this context, an expert expert was requested by the expert, the list of courts, which was filed with the competent appellant-investigator in February 2024. On the same day, a press conference was given, where our posts and the testimony were reported. Consequently, no concealment took place. The content of the report is obvious that it could not be released, because as part of the case file, which is in the main interrogation stage, it is covered by absolute secrecy.
Further, any public placement on documents located in the file file, in particular from a part of which has contributed them, constitutes a breach of the secret interrogation. ./.
Due to the knowledge of this finding, we did not take a formal public position on its conclusions, nor did we adopt opposite approaches. As it turned out from the course of the investigations, the initial assumptions of the State General Chemistry were overthrown by the finding of EPANAAM, as the prime minister himself admitted.
Recall that the above -mentioned expert report refers to a number of issues related to the crime of Tempi and the expert took into account the information known at the time of its retirement.
It is obvious, in the light of the foregoing, that the relevant publication of the “dying” of the expert report is completely unfounded and serves the communication needs of public opinion from the basic questions that require answers to the accident itself (717 and so on).
Completely investigating the crime of Tempi and the rendering of justice are a pretext for the Bar. And in this direction we will continue to move on to move without this kind of impulses.