“Mr Zervos’ silence is a confession of guilt. He is not going to escape from the debt owed to society and honest farmers accountability, “PASOK-KINAL sources said, commenting on the deposition at the deposition in Inquiry Committee investigating the OPECEPE caseof the former Vice President of the Organization, Eleftherios Zervos, from 23/1/2024 to 31/1/2025.
The same sources referred to “an unprecedented incident at today’s meeting of the OPEKEPE examination committee, with former OPEKEPE Vice President Eleftherios Zervos to choose when to answer questions and when the right of silence will be invoked”.
“Mr Zervos chose not to answer PASOK’s questions, citing the right to silence so as not to comment on everything he was saying in the jokes with his interlocutors, while he was normally answering the New Democracy questions” and “he did not hide his close relationship with him and his close relationship with him and They led to his appointment. “
The former OPEKEPE Vice President did not question the dialogues included in the case file, he simply said that he “does not remember them”, PASOK and PASOK sources emphasized added:
“He did not remember talks of hundreds of pages that seem to maintain a network of services in which former Minister of Rural Development Mr Avgenakis had a central role.
He refused to explain his conversations with individuals looking for pastures in Thessaly, individuals who were committed and eventually condemned.
He did not respond to his relationship with the presidents of KDP groups, who are alleged to act as party networks of the New Democracy. He admitted that he knew them, but had “erased” from his memory the hundreds of conversations he had with them.
And of course, he did not dare to answer the “one million” question: who is “Makis” that refers to the conversations and what role it plays in political transactions. “
As the same sources argued, “despite the dialogues read by PASOK MPs, Mr Zervos did not answer whether there were interventions in payments and committed by relatives, but he answered a very special question about his father and mother’s payments.”
“He did not specify whether he acted as a ‘mediator’ who found pasture and distributed them, as shown by the dialogues of the case file.”
“He gave no answer to his continued communication with persons who seem to be acting by political commands, intervening in the agency’s services,” PASOK’s sources argued, adding:
“He claimed that he had no in-depth acquaintance with Mr. G Xylouris, the so-called” frappe “, when his endless dialogues, as it appears from the case file, shows a constant” take “.”