“Mr. Famellos should be taught by the sufferings of his predecessors and not in a hurry to tighten the Lord 13-0,” PASOK said in a statement, continuing informal. BRA de Fer with SYRIZAin the wake of Nikos Pappas’ comments about Nikos Androulakis.
“Unless someone holds him from the right hand and leads him to attack PASOK and Nikos Androulakis playing the game of New Democracy,” concludes Harilaou Trikoupi.
“Let us tell Mr. Androulakis who pulls him every day from the right lapel”
“Truth said Nikos Pappas. Let us tell Mr. Androulakis who pulls him every day off the right lapel, “SYRIZA stresses, answering the PASOK’s previous announcement.
“The leadership of PASOK-KINAL is asking for the deletion of the SYRIZA parliamentary spokesman, describing him as an abuser! What did Nikos Pappas really say? He responded to the phrase Androulakis who said that “if the parties are summed up, their audience is reduced …”, saying that this wording “violates common sense and mathematics. And because it violates them, I feel that it may have been a veto”.
And he concludes, “Truth said Nikos Pappas. Let Mr Androulakis tell us who pulls him from the right lapel every day and let him not seek excuses for the introversion caused by his party by the daily ambiguities. “
What preceded
“Once again SYRIZA executives prove that they remain incomprehensible, immersed in the toxicity and backdrops,” says PASOK Change. Today’s statements by MP Nikos Pappas.
“PASOK constitutes a front with society by shaping the alternative government proposal and giving a political battle against the New Democracy. Does the SYRIZA leadership condemn the unthinkable statements of Mr. Pappas? Or adopts them? Will a toxic hybrid a member of SYRIZA still remain a member of SYRIZA? “
It is recalled that in his morning television appearance at Mega, Mr Pappas said, among other things, that “SYRIZA has been talking about the need for an electoral alliance for a long time. Mr. Androulakis denies it, as he denied the alliance with us when there was a simple analog. It is a decision to be judged, “he added, adding that” his wording (Mr. Androulakis’) that if we add the forces will be reduced as a whole, it violates common sense and mathematics. And because he violates them, I feel like someone might have vetoed him. “