In a harsh confrontation with all the material between the government and the opposition parties it seems that the debate will be transformed within the first decade of June to recommend it. pre -trial committee that puts in the frame of responsibilities for the Tempi him Costa Ah. Karamanlis And not only.
The New Democracy, however, yesterday with the request he filed only refers to Kostas Ah. Karamanlis and in a misdemeanor for breach of duty– A decision that has sparked strong reactions from the opposition. The PASOK Having targeted eight (the two former ministers, Mr Karamanlis, Spirtz and their six deputy ministers), he speaks of a felony and attacks the New Democracy, arguing that her request “finds contradictions and substantially” made “an outrageous law. Get rid of a parliament. ”
Harilaou Trikoupi executives who continue the harsh attacks on and for his OPECEPE show in the direction of a harsh collision in plenary session Parliament For all the issues but also focus on the tragedy of Tempi, saying that “Bakaimis himself determines that Mr Karamanlis was supervised by security”. The breach of duty they attribute to K. Karamanlis- insist- is that it was intended to harm OSE. And add, attempting to analyze the data:
“That is how what he did, he did it to hurt the OSE depriving resources and staff. It is a legal acrobatics, rejected by Bakaimis himself, who in his indictment writes that “there is a direct surveillance and control of the Ministry of Infrastructure and Transportation by the Railway Infrastructure Administrator (OSE) in terms of the safety of the railway and rail.”
This which highlights its executives PASOK It is that the leadership of the ministry “had no administrative supervision – as they were baptized in the ND – but security supervision. They even measure a “series of contradictions”, such as the one on page 7 of the ND request, where “a” philosophical “position unfolds that a minister is not accused of infidelity or breach of duty, by definition he cannot have committed any other crime (!)- this is an interpretation!”
They then set the question That “since the Minister did not have the responsibility for the security, what can the two directors have?” And they add: “And yet Mr. Karamanlis and the Deputy Ministers had written security notifications.”
Harilaou Trikoupi tries to use three arguments through the relevant questions:
1)What did the Minister and the Deputy Ministers of a serious government do when on 6.9.2021 the confidential letter of then TRAINOSE CEO Philip Tsalidis to the President and Managing Director of OSE Spyros Father, was notified to the political leadership?
2)What did they do when on 10.9.2021 a document by General Manager A. Polaki to the political leadership warns that the OSE state funding has not yet been signed through a contract with the State, even causing the European Commission’s intervention? The lack of resources, according to Mr Polaki’s explicit and clear warning to political leadership, has led to limited maintenance of infrastructure with impact on the safety, functionality and quality of services.
3) What did the Minister and his deputy ministers do when a document of the Railway Regulatory Authority observes the increase in the frequency of accidents on 13.12.2021? “Our intervention is derived from our deep concern about the safety of rail transport in our country,” the letter wrote. This concern is repeated on 23.12.2021 with a new RAS document. to the political leadership of the ministry. Four (4) days before the tragic accident, the president of RAS It sends a letter to the OSE from 24.2.2023 by notification to the Hellenic Train, in which it records a case of unprotected trajectory change similar to that occurred in the Tempe accident, inviting it to be ascertained if it is “inadequate education, fatigue or something else”.
At the same time the ending is expected of the debate between SYRIZA and a new left to submit a joint request against the governmenthowever, it seems to be a fairly “rough” process for the two parties, with the central point of disagreement on whether he enters the frame and the name of Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis (Koumoundouros officials).
Their pending decisions will also guide the relative exchange of fire with the government in plenary, and will also determine the possible alliances to the vote. The question is whether at the end of the day- PASOK executives are noted- the new left support Harilaou Trikoupi’s proposal.
In the field of self-government anyway- and with the backdrop of Gaza- there was The signing of a joint resolution in the municipality of Athens (after some changes were made to the original text) by the lineup of H. Doukas, Mr. Zachariadis.
In the aftermath of the exchanging fire for OPEKEPE in 2017-2025, Mr Androulakis criticized the government in the meantime that he is seeing the state as a loot. He reminded that in the discussion of the timely question he asked at the beginning of this year, Mr Mitsotakis spoke of some shadows in OPEKEPE. “The prime minister has been exposed, our country has again been brought back at European level by this new scandal charged by the current government and the previous SYRIZA government. So the message is that the state must operate with transparency rules and be next to the citizen as far away as the citizen of the center of Athens. That is why PASOK invests and supports local government and regional development across the country. “