Conflicting between the Minister of Migration and Asylum, Thanos Plevris and the President of the Freedom Freedom, was reported in the House of Representatives during his discussion of his debate. Bill on the Reformation of the Framework and Citizens’ Returns Procedures.
In her speech, the president of the Freedom Freedom, had spoken of revival of racism and xenophobia and the attempt to reflect the alien conditions experienced by citizens, to someone else – to foreigners, who are allegedly to blame, who are, who are, who are people,
You have not defended as a lawyer for oppressed people seeking asylum, but favored who were persecuted for financial crimes, Mr Constantopoulou responded to Mrs Konstantopoulou. I didn’t see you handling asylum cases of asylum, but favored, he said. You have defended the cryptocurrencies, a Russian who managed to remain in constant judicial proceedings, and who was eventually convicted in France. You handled another case with a person who had three nationals, with a company in Latin America and 1.8 million, and you even sued the asylum case operator that she had violated her rights. Also another Russian, which again had an order from Interpol and you took over his case, which was about 29 billion rubles, said Mr Plevris.
The president of the Freedom Summer spoke about slander by responding to the Minister of Migration. I am 22.5 years of lawyer. The social and activist law I am serving, the defense of the weak against relentless powers and against international interests, is recorded. According to Ms Constantopoulou, Mitsotakis intervened in the Vinik case, while in France, her former client was acquitted in the 21 criminal charges and was imposed only by a misdemeanor.
I have also defended another Russian, who was politically persecuted in his country for opposing Crimea’s annexation by Mrs Konstantopoulou.
You defended the Russian “Mr Bitcoin” and not someone who came by boat, Mr Plevris replied.
In addition, the Minister of Immigration and Asylum denied Mrs Konstantopoulou, according to which reports were reported by Deputy Minister Mr. Mylonakis to hold evidence of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office for OPEKEPE before they were made public. “There is no element in what you are saying. Say, who named Mr. Mylonakis for anything? Nowhere. You are referring to publications that you confirm it itself, without mentioning anywhere Mr. Mylonakis. [..] Yesterday (in Parliament) Mylonakis responded to what you say [..] They are theories that you often come in, you say generally and indefinitely and take your own testimony as a bastard. The only one who supports what you are saying is you and are at the same time a lawyer, and a witness, and a judge, and our national prosecutor .. But you see that there are decisions that may come out and don’t like. Always, what is bothering you is the bad guys, the judges, the bad employees. The bad guys who intervene, but at the end of the day, what you say, eventually stay in your own sphere and to the MPs you have, Mr Plevris said.