An unprecedented section on post -parliamentary and parliamentary data opens the decision of Court for the deduction from the parliamentary office of three elected members of the National Delegation. The final judgment of the Supreme Special Court leads to definitive ‘miscarriage’ from the House of Santa Claus, Petrou Dimitriadis and Alexandrou Zervea while calling on the plenary to operate until the next national elections with 297 MPs as it does not prefer a process of replenishing the vacant seats.
According to the rationale of the decision the participation of the party of Spartan In the June 2023 national elections, it is considered a total of illegal as the real leadership was found by the first instance convicted of a criminal organization. Elias Kassidiarishowever, the consequences of the relevant law are activated only for the specific 3 MPs against whom appeals were brought. The remaining 9 elected with the Spartans (I. Kontis, H. Katsivardas, G. Manousos, I. Dimitrokallis, D. Valtogiannis, Th.
It should be noted that the decision of the Court is fully harmonized with the corresponding plenary session of the A1 section of Supreme Court which banned the descent of the Spartans in the latest European elections, but not with the recent decision of the One -Member Court of Appeal which found the Spartans innocent on the criminal offense of the crime of deceiving voters.
Alalum
For the time its bureau Parliament It awaits the official text of the Supreme Court of Justice to implement the relevant decisions and to show the definitive exit from Parliament to Stenia, Dimitriadis and Zervea.
At the same time, however, in the background conflicting views by experienced legal and constitutionalists Whether the reduction of the entire number of MPs to 297 is downward and the limits of the required majorities to submit proposals, the approval of bills and the revision of the Constitution.
Their fans of a camp argue that all relevant limits must be adjusted and the majority of 151 to be 149.
This legal assessment expressed In a radio interview and Pavlos Marinakis However, adding that the government is based on a majority exceeding 151 and therefore does not affect it if the threshold is shifted down.
Opinion of the opposite shore is citing Article 74 of House of Representatives And he argues that the majority must remain at 151 as it is determined by the total number of seats and not the active Members.
The PASOK State MP, Panagiotis DoudonisHe hastened, in fact, to comment on X that “the government spokesman’s reference that” the majority of all Members, so the law says, from 151 goes 149 “is completely unconstitutional, anti -scientific and raised questions about its inquiry. The absolute majority of the entire number of Members “in the Constitution, which the entire number is defined by law, is not changed after the current GDP judicial decision, as it does not depend on the possibility of non -filing or vacuum, see Article 74 (2) of the Rules of Procedure.”
In any case associates of the Speaker of the House, Nikita Kaklamanreport to protothema.gr How to make the decision of the Court of Justice, they will ask the Parliament’s scientific service to consult the matter.
If the first view prevails, then all limits will be adjusted on the basis of 297 Members. For example, the majority of 151 will become 149, the increased majority of the 180 for the Constitutional Review will be 178, while 49 signatures will be required instead of 50.
If the second view is qualified then the provisions of Article 74 of the House of Representatives will be followed.