New Crisis to SYRIZA: Arvanitis shots, Farantouri by Akrita for her attack on journalist Angelos Prokolisiano

Character of major internal crisis perceives in SYRIZA Progressive Alliance The Movement of State MP, Helena Akrita to comment on a critical publication of the author, Angelouof the Documento newspaper.

Except the author’s own responseThe baton was taken from top executives, taking public distances from Mrs Akrita. By opening the dance of reactions, the SYRIZA MEP, Kostas Arvanitis He stressed that “the attacks of politicians, from any political group, to journalists and independent media, the attacks on free expression, commentary, satire, are dangerous conservatism.”

In detail, the Arvanitis post is the attack of Elena Akrita

🔻 The attacks of politicians, from any political group, to journalists and independent media, the attacks on free expression, commentary, satire, are dangerous conservatism.

🔻 The Left in the European Parliament and of course SYRIZA -PS has taken a clear, honest and vigorous position against organized or non -attacks against journalists and independent media, without weighing whether the political perspective of the writing serves or serves its political narrative or political narrative.

🔻 I do not judge whether the attack is fair or unfair, targeted or misplaced.

🔻 Any attack by political organizations or persons against journalists is unacceptable and condemned.

🔻 Journalists have to do their job, reckless, unmistakable, free, with the subjectivity judged by citizens and their consciousness.

🔻 They should not obtain approval from the political subject.

🔻 That’s why we got here where we arrived …

Syriza European Parliament The Left

Farantouris: Press freedom cannot be a la carte

The other MEP received the baton, Nicolas Farantourisstating that “I have received fierce attacks by the press – print & electronic, fellow citizen & opposition. I never turned against, even for absolutely hostile publications. Freedom of the press cannot be a la carte. @documentonews @aprovolisianos ».

‘He put us all in a difficult position’

Polakis was also on the side of Polaki, as his fixed interlocutor and member of SYRIZA, George Panagiotopoulos He emphasized that “the State of State made a serious mistake. He identified a newspaper with a patriotic comment and showed it as an enemy of SYRIZA. A newspaper and a publisher without whom the battle with the system would have been lost early and unharmed. Tragically early and tragically unscathed. Signing, as a “press office of SYRIZA”, involved the unquestionable president of SYRIZA PS in the blurry and awkward position of the hypothetical “representative” of the comment. So he put all of us in a difficult position. “

In detail, the post of Panagiotopoulos:

About the “controversy” Akrita- Documento.

Because silence is not golden, let’s stop putting an own goal.

Socrates Famellos is a powerful and hardworking president and does not need any form.

A signed marketing comment published in Documento (written dozens of daily in the newspapers) sparked an unnecessary controversy that undermines the positive dynamics of SYRIZA MS and the extent of his public discourse to an audience who loves and trusts research.

✅ The Virgin Mary (and not the journalist) Elena Akrita commented publicly with phraseology that reflects her personal recruitment from a Patriotic comment, which was not the post of the newspaper for Socrates Famello. In this way he opened a front that blatantly unknowingly, the president of SYRIZA PS and the collective effort of the party’s bodies in a unit fight against the Mitsotakis regime. In practice, he succeeded in the opposite of what he sought. With an inappropriate comment he shifted the point of attention exactly where the system wants. On the platform. Human mistake, harmful “keep on”.

A wave of “curses” against Documento on social media has been triggered, as if we are ongoing a commitment of dedication to the president with whom we all work perfectly on the party’s organs.

Who and what is cursed and discredited by all those who have been fanatical by the alleged “Famello” question? Documento, from the first day of its existence, is dragged into the courts by the publisher of Kostas Vaxevanis the interests that fought and demolished Alexis Tsipras, the thieves and the bulls that formed the antitrust front, driving with Ferrari to their foot, and his mistakes).

✅ The State of State made a serious mistake. He identified a newspaper with a patriotic comment and showed it as an enemy of SYRIZA. A newspaper and a publisher without whom the battle with the system would have been lost early and unharmed. Tragically early and tragically unscathed. Signing, as a “press office of SYRIZA”, involved the unquestionable president of SYRIZA PS in the blurry and awkward position of the hypothetical “representative” of the comment. So he put all of us in a difficult position. The party has a press spokesman and bodies responsible for evaluating the event.

Was the controlled-then- from the subsequent departed of the young, AVGI was pushing Pavlos Polakis by posting octopus headlines was another Sunday? Was anyone cursed? I don’t think. On the contrary, the “we would put Chiodra” and they celebrated as if they killed the dragon.

In this contrast of the system and its columns, many believe that SYRIZA led him to shrink the supposed confidence when society was boiling and disgusting marked capitulation.

How did Socrates Famello himself behave the party of defeat? He had not even proposed and elected to his political secretariat. Let us leave the hypocrisy.

✅ SYRIZA needs allies ready and willing to get the battle to the end. And Documento is one of them. It is not a party medium. It is an independent newspaper and its readers vote for SYRIZA, not Mitsotakis or PASOK. In this sense, the State of State did not offer good service. ESIEA took the part of the newspaper and the Documento enemies’ enemies abandons SYRIZA MS for a lack of respect for the freedom of expression of the media. More catastrophic could not go.

✅ Let all this stop here, it doesn’t benefit SYRIZA. Socrates Famellos is not a Simitis to need to need toileties. It has the support, confidence and cooperation of all SYRIZA members and executives. The barren fanaticism and the endless logic of the “goal” are over every time the party stands up.

Accidents in public expression occur. The problem is to turn them into an informal political position of the party without the party’s decision.

Let’s come here. It doesn’t benefit.

(When Papaflesas searched allies he found himself standing alone in Maniaki because he had expelled them all by ignoring the small mistakes left to become big).

With honest and companionate love,

With confidence in SYRIZA MS that we build every day and all together,

George K. Panagiotopoulos

Member SYRIZA PS.