Mitsotakis opened the debate on lifting permanence in the State – New Disciplinary Framework comes for the State

Finding social maturity but also the inter -party consensus in its perspective lifting For them civil servantsthe Kyriakos Mitsotakis “Catch the thread” yesterday and through his interview with SKAI 100.3 radio station he clearly announced that ND would bring the issue to discuss the forthcoming constitutional reviewrequesting the amendment of Article 103 (4).

Intersection point for that discussion was MARC’s recent research on the first topic that demonstrated the widespread inter -party consensus on the issue, even in left -wing party voters traditionally oppose such interventions in the State. The acceptance of such a move, however, is widely among civil servants by 2/3, according to the same survey. Consequently, since society is ripe and the issue has ceased to be taboo, the government has been gloomy of glorious glory in order to attempt yet another public debate, defining the agenda of confrontation.

THE Kyriakos MitsotakisAfter all, he had announced incisions in the deep state during the 2023 election campaign and admittedly the permanence of civil servants is considered one of the last “sacred cows” in the country.

This constitutional prediction holds since 1911 and his years Eleftheriou Venizeloswhile the homonymous Klafthmonos Square It was named in 1878 by the protesting civil servants who had gathered there for their dismissal by the government that succeeded the one that had appointed them.

“Under no circumstances can permanence act as a force of inactivity. Because this can happen today, ” Mr. Mitsotakis presented yesterdayalthough the government has taken measures to stimulate the efficiency of civil servants, such as the productivity bonus for those who are in a position of responsibility, and applies an evaluation system with the use of the c.

At the same time, before the gates is the new one Disciplinary framework for the public by the Minister of the Interior Theodore. However, the government estimates that evaluation often does not have content, if it does not exist, at least as the ultimate choice given the staffing of the State, the prospect of the dismissal of an employees who documented.

The 180 votes and PASOK

The discussion of permanence It is expected to open for good, when the debate will begin to determine the articles to be revised. This is expected to be done at the end of 2025 and the process of running in 2026, and at some stage of the revision, 180 votes will be required, so broader consensus. Since an article is revised with 180+ votes, 151 votes are needed in the next House to review it. If it does not garner 180 votes in the predictable parliament, the majority of 3/5 will be necessary in the review.

The PASOK Avoid yesterday to enter the discussion substantially, with the Nikos Androulakis to accuse the Prime Minister of “fireworks”, while a few days ago the press spokesman, Kostas Tsoukalashe had said that the problem of the State is not permanent. It should be noted, however, the whole discussion was opened with more intensity a few weeks ago by former PASOK Minister Costas Skandalidis.

Source link

Leave a Comment