“PASOK’s vote is a maximum parliamentary.”
“Today, one of the darkest pages in the parliamentary history of our country has been written. Specifically, during the vote to the permanent parliamentary ethics committee of the House on the request of the immunity of 14 New Democracy MPs on the offenses of the ultimate betrayal, the infringement of duty and the abuse of power, while expressing their opinion, their opinion, and their opinion, They voted for “present”, while the Greek solution, victory and the cruise of freedom voted in favor of the request, “the Deputy Prime Minister and a government spokesman said in a statement in a statement Pavlos Marinakis.
“And this, while Article 61 of the Constitution explicitly states that “The MP is not pursued, nor is he examined in any way for an opinion or vote he has given in the exercise of parliamentary duties, while the only case that the House may grant a license to the constitution concerns the offense of slander”“, Mr. Marinakis points out.
“In a nutshell, opposition parties adopted the Golden Dawn stance on the vote of MPs in the Memorandums and later the Greek solution for the Prespa Agreement.
The attitude of the parties of the “upper and lower square”, as well as their evolves, as sad and against the elementary rules of our democracy and if they are, it does not surprise us.
However, PASOK’s vote is a greatest parliamentary affair, which stacks the opposition party, once again in recent months, with the forces of the most extreme populism.
We call on Mr. Androulakis to review his party’s attitude and, in view of the discussion of the issue in the plenary of the House next week, even at the last minute, to save the pretexts.
It is inconceivable that, 51 years after the restoration of democracy, to discuss the obvious, such as the constitutional exercise of Members’ duties, “the government spokesman concludes in his statement.