What did the government spokesman report on opposition criticism
About the government’s efforts in terms of OPECEPE The Deputy Minister of Foreign Minister to the Prime Minister and a government spokesman Paul Marinakis Speaking to the Real FM radio station, noting that the situation in OPEKEPE is problematic, with many challenges remaining even after six years of ND rule. Despite the efforts, many issues, such as circuits, corruption and illegal activity in public systems, have been revealed and tackled to a large extent, Mr Marinakis said, stressing that significant steps have been taken in the right direction. However, he added that the ultimate goal has not yet been achieved and the results so far do not fully meet expectations. Mr Marinakis also said that the government has moved decisively against various public pathogens, despite the political costs, and that there have been significant success in circuit clarification and the refund in the State.
Asked if the government was inactive to the Prime Minister to the Prime Minister, he said, “We were not idle of our six years of governance … The prime minister has the opportunity and himself and through his spokesman, the ministers talking about significant successes, I mentioned you in Greece Everything has been done, many have not been done, which has not been done for many years, not everything has been done – it has the political courage and not the political hypocrisy of the other parties and predecessors to recognize what has not been done and must be done now. “
Mr Marinakis said that Mr. Marinakis said that “OPECEPE’s reorganization initiatives have been taken, at least one and a half years, on the basis of details presented by the Minister of Rural Development, Mr. Tsiaras.”
Regarding the resignations of ministers, Mr Marinakis said that this is not shown to be criminal, nor does it mean that those MPs who have resigned from deputy ministers should be thrown into the fire.
For the criticism of the opposition, Mr Marinakis said we must hear the opposition proposals and the criticism based on data. “Slander and hypocritical logic and to hear 3% of parties with irrevocably doomed. That is, do you consider it reasonable, for example, the president of the party of irrevocably convicted ministers by the Special Court, who was elected through a nightclub and has reached 3%, saying the prime minister, do you consider it a reasonable criticism that we must hear? That is, to spend our time dealing with such extremes? A man who has associated a man’s death with the government two months ago, do you think he has a seriousness, to deal with? Or listening to PASOK speak, “falls out of the clouds” when he hears dialogues about rusks? Or to “fall from the clouds” for agricultural subsidies, do you think it has a basis? I say it again: We should not set off, why? Because we have been a government for six years. Indeed, it is wrong, it annoys the world. But, This does not mean that the opposition is serious, which thinks that the parties they represent each were founded in 2019, 2020, 2021 … “.
When it became known to the government, the OPECEPE scandal, the government spokesman said, “Look, it is a given that the big issue, the problematic situation of OPECEPE, with a series of actions, has been attempted by the government to address it with a series of initiatives. It’s not that all this started only on chiara. Obviously, the initiatives had been taken, but, as you saw, this result was not desirable. And that is why the prime minister has also taken the politically responsibility with his post yesterday’s post and a number of other answers he has given. Proof, I’ll tell you a thorny proof that we didn’t expect any European Public Prosecutor’s Office. The issue we are discussing where is it based? In a 2014 decision, which made it even worse, the technical solution, that is, SYRIZA in 2017. This decision was applied by Makis Voridis. He has said it very in detail. That is, a ministerial decision that “inherited”. Who abolished this logic, this way? This road was abolished by the New Democracy government in 2023. I say it again: Did we have to wait four years? But that’s why we’ve said politically that they are one of the issues we haven’t done what we should do. Responsibility is not shared. “