To the government’s proposal for Inquiry Committee In terms of OPECEPE but also In the proposal by SYRIZA and New Left with which they seek pre -trial For the same issue, the government spokesman reported Paul Marinakis Speaking to Alpha 989.
As he said For the ND proposal “We do not hide our own period, but many issues have to be brightened, what is the technical solution, how many cases have been sent to justice and more. It is a choice with intense self -criticism and we invite all the parties that have ruled not to think small -scale. “
Speaking to George Eugenides, the government spokesman insisted that “by studying the case file we do not see evidence that is a criminal offense.”
“There is no reason for the opposition to say no to the examination as this committee is discussing everything because, by analogy, we cannot discuss a 6 -storey building that collapsed 5th and 6th and not talk about its foundations,” Mr Marinakis continued.
And by criticizing the SYRIZA-New Left proposal, the government spokesman commented that “it is ironic to formulate the indictment SYRIZA for the ministers who, as a point, applied the technical solution and expanded it by updating the 2017 ministerial decision and deposited a two subsequent ministers that they implemented this solution. “
“On whether there should be a technical solution, how it was implemented, what role in the local government is one of the most important individual discussions on European subsidies. One thing is to exhaust this political debate and another to come to SYRIZA and the new left and to form a indictment because they continued to do what they were doing. “
“Translating a bad application of a solution to an indictment has no substance. Where does it come from Mr Voridis? If you look at the case file, you will see that it is an interpretation of the opposition. It is an interpretation of a deposit from the opposition point of view, “Mr Marinakis added, referring to a” embarrassing reaction “from the opposition to the ND proposal” why didn’t you go to Trikoupi years? ”
“When discussing the issue of European subsidies we must go to the beginning of its establishment. 1st Question: Why was something set up in 1998, operated in 2001. 2nd question on what terms was established? So the examination has two purposes. Obviously the limitation for a felony is back in 15 years, in any case criminal responsibility can be concerned by 2010. Anyone who talks about concealment forgets that the investigation will end up today. “
Asked about the Inquiry Committee, the government spokesman said, “he will have a 10 -witness process. They will be asked in a pressing way to clarify things they say in their deposits. The opposition will push for whether what they are saying is a criminal offense because it is a matter of interpretation to date. We will wait to see these answers and then we will look at our attitude. If it is the same as the case file, our attitude will not change. “
Finally, he was called upon to respond to why the government chose the Inquiry Committee while Kyriakos Mitsotakis has commented negatively on the operation of this processPavlos Marinakis replied that “the examinations have not worked today because the political system, mainly responsible for the opposition, uses them to criticize political criticism. The most typical case is the Tempi exam. Opposition parties brought as many findings as their numbers. The prime minister spoke in all the tactics of the parties. If the opposition had made a finding in Tempi on a bad government then it would be able to talk about a bad government. When there are 8 parties and 8 findings then what you have is that they are trying to party the process. ”