The government -PASOK controversy continues with the announcements, after the designations of “liar” and “slanderer” addressed by the Nikos Androulakis To the government spokesman, who asked him to withdraw the offensives on his face.
THE Paul Marinakis He came back in a harsh language, accusing PASOK’s president of “refusing to rebuild the insults” “would be just a” apology, wrong “. But Mr. Androulakis’ PASOK has forgotten political culture, “he said.
Calling for K. Androulakis But also PASOK that they “choose to postpone their responsibilities”, Mr Marinakis noted that “it is not possible for the opposition leader to hide behind something a journalist was conveyed to him and to resort to abusive and toxic characteristics.”
“Political discourse lessons from a party whose executives have talked about” lost wagons “and its president himself for” orchestrators of concealment “, we are not going to accept,” he said.
In detail the announcement of Pavlos Marinakis:
The PASOK And Mr. Androulakis chooses to postpone their responsibilities as usual. It is not possible for the opposition leader to hide behind something that a journalist was transferred to him and to resort to abusive and toxic characterizations.
Worse still, Mr. Androulakis refused to rebuild the insults, even when his journalist conveyed my proper statement, which of course had nothing to do with what he had. It would be enough “sorry, wrong”. But Mr. Androulakis’ PASOK has forgotten political culture.
Political speech lessons by a party whose executives have spoken of “lost wagons” and its president himself for “orchestrators of concealment”, we are not going to accept.
Personally, I will continue to argue in political terms, saying awkward truths. In terms of characterization, I invite them to take a look at their announcements to find that they are exclusively their own practice.
PASOK: Before shaking his finger would have to be informed of how his so -called
Mr Marinakis’ new announcement came in response to PASOK’s corresponding one who accused him of using offensive and diminishing characterizations for Mr. Androulakis and for “a meter of toxicity and division”.
“Mr. Marinakis before moving his finger, given the” _ of Greek knowledge of the Greek language ” – his own expression and return it to him – he should have been informed about how the journalist conveyed his words during his interview.
And now in essence:
They are not persuaded by the government’s communication tricks to charge supposedly toxicity to PASOK.
Mute opposition in front of the conceptions of the concealment of ministers ‘responsibilities in successive files, in front of citizens’ mockery and games with institutions, will not find in PASOK.
GG The Government Spokesman is constantly using offensive and reductions in his announcements for the opposition leader. He has deservedly received the title of toxicity and division. Does Mr Mitsotakis’ political aesthetics or self -act? ” PASOK reported.
Marinakis: Androulakis distorts my words, to withdraw offensive characterizations against me
Mr Marinakis’ comment had been preceded by what PASOK’s president said against him, who called on to withdraw the characterizations he gave him.
“Honorable Mr Androulakis, a few hours ago, in your television interview you said, referring to me:” So Mr. Marinakis Pavlos says, that PASOK signed a text for the ultimate betrayal, with Zoe Konstantopoulou, what is it? PASOK has not signed a text that speaks of the ultimate betrayal. “
The government spokesman replied that he never made such a reference, quoting his statement from a radio interview on “Parapolitika 90.1”: “Mr. Androulakis’ PASOK is a party that does not vote for non -state universities, Don’t like what they voted for – a party he co -signs with Mrs Constantopoulou and comes to exactly the same rhetoric, how could he be a interlocutor, how exactly? So, the PASOK we are talking about, today’s Mr. Androulakis, nothing to do with Mr. Venizelos’ PASOK and PASOK of the late Fofis Gennimata. “
In fact, “to have no doubt”, Mr. Marinakis referred to the audio excerpt of his interview.
Continuing, he accused the PASOK-KINAL president of “joining two different references, putting words in my mouth that I never said.” As he explained: “Mr. Androulakis, there are no basic knowledge of the Greek language, to understand that I never made the report – which you falsely accused me – but, on the contrary, in your party’s behavior, I was stated, among other things: Betrayal, because they voted for what they believed, which is an unprecedented questioning of the constitutionally guaranteed rights of the Members and at another time (here will help you understand the punctuation points) you have signed with Mrs. Constantopoulou, the proposal.
Concluding, Mr. Marinakis had invited Mr. Androulakis to rebuild his statements and withdraw the characterizations, putting three possibly possibilities: “In this case there are three possibilities: either you did not hear well, or you were exposed by your partners or you. In all three cases, I call you, after listening to the audio of my interview, to rebuild and withdraw offensive characterizations against me. Unless you have now acquired the same habits as your new political companions. “