Reply to statements by PASOK-KINAL President Nikos Androulakis gave the government spokesman Paul Marinakisafter Mr. Androulakis’ television interview in which he described him as a “liar” and “slanderer”.
Mr. Marinakis, in his announcement, personally addressed his President PASOKstating: “Honorable Mr. Androulakis, a few hours ago, in your television interview you said, referring to me:” So Mr. Marinakis Pavlos says, that PASOK signed a text about the ultimate betrayal, with Zoe Konstantopoulou. Because PASOK has never signed a text that speaks of the ultimate betrayal. “
The government spokesman replied that he never made such a reference, quoting his statement from a radio interview on “Parapolitika 90.1”: “Mr. Androulakis’ PASOK is a party that does not vote for non -state universities, Don’t like what they voted for – a party he co -signs with Mrs Constantopoulou and comes to exactly the same rhetoric, how could he be a interlocutor, how exactly? So, the PASOK we are talking about, today’s Mr. Androulakis, nothing to do with Mr. Venizelos’ PASOK and PASOK of the late Fofis Gennimata. “
In fact, “for no doubt,” Mr Marinakis adds, he also refers to the audio excerpt of his interview.
Continuing, he accused the PASOK-KINAL president of “You united two different reportsputting words in my mouth that I never said. ” As he explains: “Mr. Androulakis, there are no basic knowledge of the Greek language, to understand that I never made the report – of which you falsely accused me – but, on the contrary, in your party’s behavior, I have been struck by them, among other things: Betrayal, because they voted for what they believed, which is an unprecedented questioning of the constitutionally guaranteed rights of the Members and at another time (here will help you understand the punctuation points) you have signed with Mrs. Constantopoulou, the proposal.
Concluding, Mr. Marinakis called on Mr. Androulakis to rebuild his statements and withdraw the characterizations, putting three possibly possibilities: “In this case there are three possibilities: either you did not hear well, or your partners exposed, or you are telling you. In all three cases, I call you, after listening to the audio of my interview, to reconstruct and withdraw off the offensive characteristics against me. Unless you have now acquired the same habits as your new political companions. “