Episode between Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis and President of Freedom Zoe Konstantopoulou was noted, noted, noted, During the debate in Parliament to set up an Inquiry Committee about the case of OPECEPE and the management of agricultural subsidies.
The prime minister, defending the decision to put OPEKEPE under the umbrella of AADE, stressed that the Independent Public Revenue Authority has the prestige and independence to proceed with the necessary intersections to identify who is really entitled to the amounts of the aid. At the same time, he said that investigations are already being carried out, some farmers have begun to return the money they have received uneasily and soon, as he said, the state would have a complete picture of the illegal routes. “The amounts to be refunded will be charged, starting with the most blatant cases,” he noted.
His intervention caused her reaction Konstantopoulouwhich left implicitly for the government’s choice to entrust AADE, saying, “Put the wolf to guard the sheep.”
Mr Mitsotakis responded with intensity, reiterating that the government was choosing the path of institutional investigation and stressed that the ongoing investigation is the only serious and reliable answer “in the present time”.
The controversy culminated when the President of Freedom Freedom referred directly to the two former government ministers: “Will you check Voridis and Avgenakis?”
The prime minister’s reaction was immediate: “You are not in court to defend rapists,” he said in a strong style.
After repeated holidays, the prime minister again addressed Mrs Constantopoulou, she told her: “At last to gain.”
Mrs Konstantopoulou also attacked House Speaker Nikita Kaklamanis, who replied: “If I do not like a censure suggestion.”
More specifically the conversation:
Mitsotakis: The era of easy subsidies is coming to an end. Modernization The improvement of productivity and production is the priority. Let this be this unpleasant reality catalyst for reforming the primary sector. If one considers that this problem is only political and not social it is wrong.
The ministry has frozen thousands of VAT and re -examines organic productions. The suspicious role of the Reception Centers will also be investigated in the exam. In collaboration with Brussels, it has been drafted since 2024 long before the OPECEPE Full Resolution Plan was transmitted. No one fell from the clouds. We did not expect a European prosecutor. A 45 actions plan is being implemented. The financial prosecutor’s office is considering the first cases to impose penalties and fines. All this had to be done with an organization in motion. So why ND insists on an Inquiry Committee. We are determined to learn the truth and deal with the problem. It is the test window of opportunity to resolve the primary sector.
Konstantopoulou: Will you come?
Mitsotakis: Stop at last to glow
Konstantopoulou: You will come
Mitsotakis: I don’t deal with you
Konstantopoulou: What did you say. You don’t like the opposition
Kaklaman: Yes! Slowly the opposition
Konstantopoulou: To recall
Kaklaman: Make me a censure suggestion
Mitsotakis: We need to change the regulation to deal with all these behaviors offending a top parliament. You did it in the Tempe accident. Distortion. Political and criminal responsibilities are confused. This is a cynical opportunism with aggressive and vulgar rhetoric. For the first time we see PASOK and SYRIZA sharing with other extreme left and far -right parties the same black vocabulary. Junta Mafia Komora. Resort to past practices of fake news and toxicity. I quoted the reasons why the examination is the appropriate solution. I attempted to highlight the raw opportunism of opposition positions. To once again highlight the danger that our homeland and social life return to dissolving introversion when our turmoil is exacerbated and the authoritarian voices are increasing. In such an environment I have as an elected prime minister – to remind them of those who repeat the junta – Greece does not have the luxury of experimentation and questioning of internal stability and cohesion. I would seek more responsibility and more seriousness. I make a last appeal: Retire your request for a pre -trial committee. Come and vote together the exam. After all, if there are evidence we can go to pre -trial. Only in this way can we answer a structural problem. We could give this answer together. This is asking society that has the feeling that the scandal we are discussing is not party is intermittent and has already shared responsibilities
Watch the related videos:
