Judicial justification for Gregory Dimitriadis for a defamatory post

Unanimously justified the Athens Court of First Instance him Gregory Dimitriadis In his lawsuit against the Journal of Editors, by his decision No. 868/2025. The decision in question It concerns the violation of a journalistic ethics but also in refusal of restoration Demonstant publication.

The court rejected the newspaper’s and its journalists’ allegations of “unacceptable and illegal.Slapp“(Strategic silence through judicial lawsuits).

The Court has awarded financial compensation in favor of Mr Dimitriadis for the moral injury he suffered because of a defamatory title which Posted in EFSYN on November 8, 2023entitled: ‘New Extraordinary by Gr.” According to the rationale of the decision, the title – in conjunction with the content of the article – created the average reader the wrong impression that Mr Dimitriadis’ out -of -court protest to journalists aimed to suppress freedom of the press.

The Court ruled that the Journal of Editors showed ‘Great negligence’ and violated her fundamental obligations on journalistic ethics. The decision states that the newspaper was aware of the offensive character of the title of the plaintiff’s personality, however, it published it.

In addition, it is noted that, despite the Extraordinary protest by Mr. Dimitriadisthe authors and the newspaper never revoked the title in question, nor the insult.

The court ruling is an important legal precedent for the limits of journalistic responsibility and the weighting between the freedom of the press and the protection of personality.

News today:

Who are involved in tomorrow’s strike – the hours to move subway, electric, buses and trolleys

Haris Vafias: The Greek does not come to the boats not to spoil his sugar, he wants to be at home and get 1,500 euros

Scientists say they have revived the missing anti -tales, known by Game of Thrones – see puppies

Source link

Leave a Comment