Responsibilities to the mother of the little one Panagiotakis For the death of 15 months infant in August 2024, the Irene Mourtzoukou In the apologetic memorandum she filed with the Achaia investigator on Sunday (14.7.25), which was brought to Korydallu prisons today. At the same time, Irene Mourtzoukou puts in the “frame” of responsibilities and her mother, Popi Anagnostopoulou, which she accuses of publishing from the age of 15.
It is recalled that Irene Mourtzoukou has confessed to the murder of her two babies in 2022 and 2023, the infant of Katerina’s girlfriend in 2021 and her own sister in 2014. What she did not confess is the death of little Panagiotakis for whom she is responsible for.
“The above Kalliopi … all these months is trying to lead me to take responsibility for the death of her child, except for me it is impossible to” charge “the death of the last hope of salvation of life, my soul, my existence. It is noteworthy that, from the day of the death of Panagiotis (5/8/2024) to the month of June 2025, it housed me secretly in her home in Amaliada, which is certainly incompatible with the publicly presented, image of the outraged (supposedly) mother with her “mother”.
Indeed, the confession of the killer is trying to differentiate the case of Panagiotakis from that of the other four babies, whose murders have admitted:
“The rest of the infants were infants, up to six (6) months, while Panagiotakis was a big child, aged fifteen (15) months, and the other infants were girls, while Panagiotakis was a boy.” And he concludes: “It is undoubtedly that Panagiotakis” does not fit the pattern of murder “.
She also argues that after the death of the child, his mother housed her secretly at her home: “From the day of the death of Panagiotis (5/8/2024) to June 2025, she housed me secretly in her home in Amaliada, which is certainly not compatible with her.
Elsewhere in the memorandum, he states willing to fully testify for the child’s death conditions, as long as there is a formal call and security guarantee: “I cannot and is not allowed at this procedural stage […] To go into the details of the way, method, cause, etc. of his death, but I am at the disposal of the authorities […] To reveal everything. “
The third person
Indeed, in her memorandum the accused speaks of a third party, who does not name, but as she says, plays a “catalytic role” in the case:
“A catalytic role has played another-the man whose name I will only reveal to the competent prosecutors / investigating authorities […] since I accept constant and strong threats to my life and my physical integrity. “
In addition, he claims that he is at the disposal of the authorities for complete clarification of the case, in order to “not remain the slightest point of this tragic story in the dark”.