“The unity of the party is based on PASOK members and executives. I trust the intra-party process, “Katerina Batzeli said shortly after six in the afternoon at Harilaou Trikoupi for the meeting of the Ethics Committee, which she has been referred to after a television statement, which she had described as” toxic “to his” toxic “. At the table of the responsible ethics committee, where 8 of its 11 members are supporters of Mr. Androulakis, all three scenarios are: the reprimand, the suspension of party status for a few months or even the deletion. If the lady Batzeli “Deleted” for three or six months from the party, then it will not be able to descend, like her other comrades, at the conference of PASOK And to re -claim its election to the Central Committee, and if the “penalty” is longer (eg one year), then it will not have the right to fight for a parliamentary seat in northern Athens, which in 2023 in the double elections.
In any case the decision of his leader PASOK To refer her to the disciplinary for recent statements causes intra -party unrest, and it contributes to the unifying course of the party. Haris Doukas reacted through his associates from the first moment, and had one day earlier avoided negative comments, although his annoyance over the non -exploitation of more executives he had proposed to staff the party sectors was obvious- at least This is supported by executives who supported him in the intra -party elections and clashed hard with Androulakis, but also with his Paul Geroulanou.
Paul Geroulanos was annoyed with the Duke’s signal and with the hint that the referral Batzeli It shows “two meters and two weights” by the leadership. Why? Because Mr Doukas indirectly mentioned except clearly to reinforce his argument that Mr Geroulanos was among the executives who, with his statements, caused turmoil. The leadership’s parliamentary spokesman and candidate was re -positioned on the issue and recommended other executives, and therefore to Mr Doukas, to turn their attention to the issues that concern citizens. OR Anna Diamantopoulou He also avoided commenting on the disciplinary procedure activated his decision Nikos Androulakis, emphasizing yesterday that “if someone has another view of collaborations to say clearly”. OR Mrs. Diamantopoulou She focused on her statements on the “doctrine” that PASOK has many edited proposals but are not highlighted and that this will now try, but the harsh reality shows that in PASOK the climate of united and collective actions remains a demand.
No one disagrees with the autonomous course to the elections, but the conversation often turns around and in an anarchic way. What did the Mrs. Batzeli Last Thursday that led her two days after a decision by Harilaou Trikoupi to discipline? “For PASOK’s latest announcement, I personally find it to be a toxic and wrong statement. As it is toxic, Mr Pappas told Mr Androulakis that someone was pulling him from his right -wing lapel. PASOK as an institutional, essential party, cannot slide to type 13-0 toxicity. Justice decided, it is, we closed. And to follow the “Lagaz” of the New Democracy confirms that someone is pulling you off the right lape. ” Nikos Pappa on collaborations with spikes against Mr. Androulakis. May executives consider the lady’s statement inappropriate Batzeli – “I wouldn’t have done it,” he said Manolis Christodoulakis and Thodoris Pearl- But they are looking forward to a decision that will brake the intra -party … civil war in PASOK.