After the fierce confrontation between ND and PASOKwith the blue lineup talking about “Pontius Pilate”, a new counter has erupted, this time, between Koumoundourou and Harilaou Trikoupi. Initially, PASOK announced that it is being drawn up with the proposal of unconstitutionality laid down by the president of Freedom Freedom, Zoe Konstantopoulou, but is voting “present” to an amendment that suspends asylum seeking for three months for Libya flows.
The first points came from the side of Harry Kastanidis who wrote, “Today I have learned that you first support the unconstitutionality of an amendment and then vote” present “. High -level lesson, solid logic and intelligent guidance. ” Followed by SYRIZA Who, in his post, said in a statement: “The country does not need balancers but a serious, progressive, realistic political plan in contrast to the failed government policy. Where Mitsotakis’ government fails, the progressive space can and must take on its responsibilities».
SYRIZA’s announcement
«Mr. Androulakis ‘attitude and “present” of Mr. Pinal’s amendment to Mr Plevris’ amendment in front of the blatant violation of international law by the government is indicative of his inability to exercise opposition in the far -right, populist policies of ND. It is worth noting that former Commissioner D. Avramopoulos and former Ministers Keridis, Voultepsi and Syrigos were differentiated by their public discourse from Mitsotakis – Plevris legislation, which, for the most part, was elaborated by M. Voridis.
Everyone’s attitude towards the protection of human life, respect for international conventions and the demand for equal assumption of responsibility for EU countries. It cannot be heterosexual by reasonable balance. There is no “center” between European law, humanity and far -right populism but a “center” but a gap and embarrassment.
The country does not need balancers but a serious, progressive, realistic political plan in contrast to the failed government policy. Where Mitsotakis’ government fails, the progressive space can and must take on its responsibilities».
PASOK’s response
SYRIZA criticism, however, did not remain unanswered as the PASOK press office stresses that “”It needs an active and effective treatment of the problem in a completely different direction from that, with communication incentives, the New Democracy government chose“, While pointing out that ‘PASOK has a clean front with the far -right and has proven it».
PASOK’s comment
«His attitude PASOK It is clear: it needs an active and effective treatment of the problem in a completely different direction from it, which the New Democracy government has chosen.
As the overwhelming majority of those arriving from Libya in Crete are immigrants-as the government confesses-, Plevri amendment measures are ineffective.
PASOK’s proposal to accelerate the control of asylum applications and returns of those who do not have a refugee profile in countries of origin is the most effective and compatible with the protection of human life and international conventions.
PASOK has a clear front with the far right and has proven it. Inactivity against real problems reinforces the far -right rhetoric especially when it comes from political forces that were in the past in the past with what they said and failed miserably».