PASOK spokesman, PASOK’s spokesman for “cutter” and “distortion of truth” accuse government sources. Kostas Tsoukala, on the occasion of statements he made in his television interview for him Paul Marinaki.
“After all, Mr Varas or Mr Voridis is right? Yesterday, Mr Marinakis said that Mr Voridis has political responsibility because this is the only way to explain his phrase for “exclusive responsibility” “, PASOK’s spokesman said, speaking to SKAI on the issue of OPECEPE.
“The constant use of” cutter “methods and the distortion of the truth by PASOK, are largely explained why the needle has been” stuck “, as even officials in the opposition party.” report government sources and add: “The latest sample of” Copper “was the current interview of PASOK spokesman K. Tsoukalas at the SKAI television station where he claimed that the government spokesman said that” Mr Voridis has political responsibility “, Something that was never said by Mr Marinakis when informing political editors. Indeed, Mr Tsoukalas knowingly distorted Mr Marinakis’ statement, adding that “only this can explain his phrase for sole responsibility”.
“Because the falsification of the truth, in the absence of serious political discourse, has now become a rule in PASOK, we quote the relevant excerpts of the government spokesman’s statements, which shows that Mr Marinakis has never spoken of Mr Voridis’ political responsibility:
“The political level is well known between Mr Varra and Mr Voridis. It’s nothing new. We didn’t become wiser. The only thing that Mr Varra’s deposition was confirmed, among all the other deposits he was expecting and the opposition “in the corner” to tool, is that both Mr Varas and all the others who filed, confirmed that there was no Maximus intervention and no intervention. This does not mean that given this political disagreement – differentiation, it describes any criminal liability of Mr Voridis, a narrative that the opposition was struck by the previous period, without the slightest element. It’s two different things. Our position does not change in the alleged criminal liability of Mr Voridis, who did not arise from absolutely any evidence. “
“Now, in terms of Mr Voridis’ responsibility, if you want to ask me something specific, because if Mr Voridis is responsible for implemented something that was already foreseen legally and suggested by the relevant administration, which existed from the previous government, this is a conversation that I think. But I do not think it is right that has been the case for many years and Mr Voridis inherited, in the need of farmers, to translate into the sole political responsibility of Makis Voridis. In terms of criminal responsibilities, yes, I was clear and I think the New Democracy parliamentary group and the data itself was clear, no matter how the opposition tried to distort them. “ The sources are complemented.
Who is the new companion of Ioanna Tunis, Dimitris Spyridonidis
Emotion in the last farewell to Marissa Lemos at the First Cemetery of Athens