The right of silence was cited by the former vice -president of OPECEPE Lefteris Zervos (2023-2024) avoiding answering the content of the dialogues included in the European Public Prosecutor’s case for the mechanism of paying agricultural aid.
The witness argued that he has the property of the suspect as his cellphone was watched by ELAS in the context of the lawful disadvantages and chose to make use of the rights given by the Criminal Code to suspects and accused.
“I rely on the right to silence. An investigation is being carried out and my telephone confidentiality has been lifted. I am here to answer anything. But I can’t answer something I don’t know. I do not know the dialogues if they are so fragmentary. I rely on my right to silence and non -self -evolution in the part of dialogues, “Mr Zervos said. Earlier, Ms Milena Apostolaki (PASOK) had invited him to explain his own dialogues with OPEKEPE executives and breeders are dialogues in the case file and their content raises strong questions about how the checks are carried out.
The witness’s attitude triggered the opposition parties.
PASOK: guilty silence
PASOK talks about a “unprecedented incident” noting that Mr Zervos “chooses when he will answer questions and when he will invoke the right of silence. He chose not to answer PASOK’s questions, citing the right of silence so that he would not comment on everything he said in the disadvantages with his interlocutors, while he was normally answering the New Democracy questions, of which he did not hide in his close relationship with Mr. Avgenakis and that he was a member of Avgenakis and that he was a member of Avgenakis.
“Mr Zervos did not question the dialogues included in the case file, he simply said that he” does not remember them. ” He did not remember talks of hundreds of pages in which he appears to be maintained by a network of services in which former PASOK sources continued to add to the central role of the former Rural Development Minister, “PASOK’s sources to add, He did not respond to his relationship with the presidents of KDP groups, who are alleged to act as party networks of the New Democracy. He admitted that he knew them, but had “erased” from his memory the hundreds of conversations he had with them. ” “Mr Zervos’ silence is a confession of guilt. It is not going to escape from society due to society and honest farmers accountability, ”the PASOK statement concludes.
B. Kokkalis: humiliation of the process
SYRIZA rapporteur Vasilis Kokkalis denounced the Bureau of the examination because he said “allowed the degradation of the process and violating the law. It is not possible to do so. Unfortunately, the conversations are notified.
ND sources: Communication tricks and small -party show from the opposition
Sources in the New Democracy, commenting on the opposition’s reaction say that “Opposition once again has shown that all that is interested in it is to create confusion and disorientation through communication tricks and small -party body.
Today, he attacked the Bureau and personally to the Chairman of the Inquiry Committee, Mr. Andreas Nikolakopoulos, who maintained the regulation and did not allow the series to turn into a serial as the opposition wishes.
The allegation of postponing the testing of the witness, Mr. Zervos, is legally unfounded and falls into the vacuum. “At the same time, majority rapporteur Makarios Lazaridis commented” The hypocrisy of opposition parties surpassed him today. She has already completed more than three hours of deposit, and has answered the questions of all rapporteurs and of course Mrs Apostolakis from PASOK and Mr. Kokkalis from SYRIZA. “
The perpetrator of the double murder was arrested at his home in Kallithea
Criminal prosecution for four offenses to the man beating woman in the middle of the street