The clarification of the Minister of Justice for the ‘marginal’ parties
Opposition parliamentary representatives for late at night to significant ministerial amendments to the Ministry of Justice’s bill began the debate in plenary. Confrontation with the Minister of Justice George Floridis about the case of Temps.
THE Minister of Justice G. Floridis He said that “the government must help with its attitude in a mild and meaningful dialogue in the House, but this label leads me to remember what is happening in this room for a year and a half.” The wing of ND MPs and the government, the minister stressed, “all this time is facing charges that they are” murderers “or that they have” dyed their hands with blood “on the Tempe case” and “when these heavy charges are reported (by any. On the contrary, there is a mourning of them, which shows the hypocrisy that exists. ” His reference to “marginal” parties yesterday, clarified Mr. Floridis, “It was not about PASOK but they know who he was talking about.”
The minister stressed that “The government, for a year and a half, is under a fake, false category through a conspiracy How he attempted to do something in the field of railway tragedy to conceal crimes. To prove, in the end, that this was a conspiracy that was directed from here and from the outside. Yes, and from the outside, with one and only goal, through a lie to fall a government, in violation of any constitutional process, every legislative function, every institutional functioning of the countrye. Fortunately, this effort failed and its burial came yesterday (En. with the finding of NTUA). “
Mr Floridis emphasized that “Justice is doing its job properly and yesterday it proved once again that she is doing her job extremely well. What proved to be yesterday and buried was the political conspiracy that was trying to provoke a politics of politics in the country, tooling emotions of the Greek people, with monstrous lies. So leave justice for your policy. You hasten to condemn and preach guilty people who have nothing to do with and all that you say. You have been condemning us for a year and a half with lies and slander. With motion suggestions, with suggestions of referral, with lies. “
Regarding the need for the amendments tabled, the minister said that “you are right that it is not positive for any government to legislate with amendments”, but here with these two amendments “they come to clarify some issues that either create shadows in the political system, excluding politicians and their families and families By the CoE’s decision on NOK, causing significant problems in building activity in our country. Since then a public debate has begun with all social actors and this amendment gives legislative solutions. “
PASOK-KINAL parliamentary spokesman Dimitris Mantzos At the start of the debate, he raised the issue of poor legislation through night amendments coming for a few hours in plenary and “they are whole bills”. Mr Mantzos said that “the first ministerial amendment was tabled yesterday at ten in the evening and has a provision on bans on politicians from having companies abroad with a completely brief and unacceptable justification” and wondered “what political persons do you legislate”. At 11 and ten at night, PASOK-KINAL spokesman noted “the second ministerial amendment, which is a small bill on the new building regulation that has caused huge problems for many of our fellow citizens for months and has caused huge problems for many of our fellow citizens. And now, there is an amendment without consultation, without consultation with any body. ” Mr Mantzos observed that while the amendment concerning the new building regulation was tabled in Parliament shortly before midnight, this morning, a non -paper has been distributed to the media with 12 questions and answers saying that “this is a parliament”. He asked the Minister of Justice to explain “why the government is legislating in the night and to withdraw the two amendments” and initiatives by Parliament Speaker Nikita Kaklamanis to keep the CTV.
SYRIZA’s parliamentary spokesman Christos Giannoulis, Looking, he said, the objections to the filing of the amendments last night of the PASOK-KINAL parliamentary spokesman saying that the government’s unexpected amendments have “become addicted and daily applied to parliament’s degradation and depreciation policy”. He said that “it is a shame to indicate in an amendment at 11 and ten in the evening that the issues that have been a whole independent bill”. Mr Giannoulis, at the same time, accused the Minister of Justice that during his position yesterday, referring to the reactions to the drawing of the Judicial Council for Christos Triantopoulos and the causes of the Tempe tragedy, “he described PASOK and PASOK” The name of colleagues, for the minister to define what he considers “marginal” parties and what he considers to be inconsistent at the height of the circumstances. “
KKE parliamentary spokesman Nikos Karathanasopoulos, Commenting on the nightly amendments he said that “history is repeated by this government as well, as the previous ones did.” Referring to the NOK amendment, he said, this legislative procedure chosen cannot solve serious problems but is chosen “because the government wants to serve specific financial interests” and called for it. On the provision of the amendment concerning the prohibitions of politicians in foreign companies, Mr Karathanasopoulos said there were suspicions that “it may be photographic”.
The Parliamentary Representative of the Freedom Freedom Alexander KazamiaFor his part, he expressed his reaction to the filing of night amendments, saying that the issue “are not only these two specific amendments” but the fact that “there has not been a single amendment tabled in the bill shortly before the last nights”. This phenomenon, Mr Kazamias said, “is a man’s maniac for the government” and does “for an obvious reason, to surprise the MPs, that the files cannot be studied properly so that the arrangements can go through without substantial control”. The MP argued that these amendments so rough that they even have mistakes. Have unrelated articles with each other.
The debate continues with the positions of the rapporteurs and specialist parties, with the Tempi case being at the political focus of MPs’ speeches.