‘No issue has ever been raised for 2.5 years of identification of victims’ corpses in Tempi“The Minister of Justice said on Tuesday morning, George Floridisexplaining that hunger striker Panos Routsi “did not make a request earlier that had been rejected”.
“He sent the extraterrestrial with his demands and at the same time began a hunger strike. No justice bodies were resolved that rejected his request, “Mr. Floridis explained.
“There is an impression in the world that there is a refusal to exist. Where? From whom? The rum mentioned what has happened, concludes without a request for identification. They call for an exhumation in order to determine if there is a chemical, not if it is the child of the one who does a hunger strike. The Supreme Court prosecutor said in a statement yesterday that a request to find out if the child is not there. But he says that 2 things can be done: either a request for exhumation or the prosecutor of the Court of Appeals, “Mr Floridis told SKAI radio.
‘If such a clean request is made then we will see it, said the Supreme Court’s prosecutorand means that the exhumation may be ordered to identify. The impression has been made that a request has been made and someone refuses it. The Prosecutor and the Judges of the Supreme Court say that on the issue of the license to explore chemicals, because the interrogation has been closed and no longer exist and the prosecutor has forwarded the proposal to the President of Larissa, the President of Larissa, then the president of Larissa, then
“If the prosecutor thinks there is no request, he cannot decide, because he has no request. If submitted, as the Prosecutor of the Supreme Courtwill be answered immediately. If a request for exhumation is made to find that this child is actually, then a separate process opens. This procedure does not prevent the progress of the trial, “the Minister of Justice said.
“A request that can be a lot afterwards to see if the bodies that have been buried is their people, satisfying this request is another process that does not affect the progress of the trial,” he added in this context.
“Justice – the President of the Appeals will decide whether this request can be satisfied. Such requests, in order to investigate whether there are two chemicals have been submitted and have been rejected by both the investigator and the Council of Appeals on the grounds that the exhumation is requested to make an investigative act but there are no chemicals/illegal load on the reports. Request associated with them does not have a background because the rejected Xyli funded by Greece and abroad, ”added Floridis.
In this context he described “a lie that the government could do something and now raised a stern. The government has no right to decide on these demands. ” He reiterated that “Justice expects if there is a request for identification and will decide on it. The president of the Larissa Appeals will decide on the request for chemicals. “
As he noted, ‘The announcement of the Supreme Court He says attempts have been made from circles so as not to close the interrogation and constantly undergo unlikely things and to supply those who want to want to politically utilize the tragedy of Tempi. One assumes that the President of the Larissa of Appeals accepts the request to see chemicals then this means that the interrogation is re -opened. “
“The Supreme Court also points out that if the delays continue to be limited. He also says that there is a submission of a rumor that if any requests are not met, they are lost. The Supreme Court says that any complaints about deficiency shortages can be put up when the trial begins and this may decide for everything eg. Supplementary interrogation. As a result, no right is lost, ”the Minister of Justice added.
“Speaking on the part of society and relatives, everyone says that the case must be attributed to justice and judged by the court. If we have new extensions as some are desperately trying, society will rightly explode and say this trial cannot be done. While there was an interrogation of 70,000 pages, experts from the best, autopsy reports, fire and ELAS reports, defendant deposits, there has been no request that has not been examined. “
Lastly called to comment the statement of former Prime Minister Antonis SamarasMr Floridis said, “I do not want to attribute bad intentions to anyone who intervenes and especially at this level, but I believe that this statement referring to persistent rejection of requests is due to a lack of proper information because no rejection or persistent rejection has existed. When such a request is not made, how to be rejected? “