I did not expect that a humble column like mine would have been the reason for a political crisis in SYRIZA and in addition to upset a political undisturbed functioning, such as Socrates Famellos. I am referring, of course, to the attack the lady made Elena Akrita In Documento, which was the reason, it was falsely implied that the journalist Angelos Douvolisianos wrote anonymously commenting on Famello, relying on anonymous sources.
The real reason for the attack was revealed by a written message he sent to SYRIZA’s CO, where he confessed that he had been colonizing them in Documento about what Babuska writes about Famello and Tsipras. Because Mrs Akrita, who likes to declare “40 years of baker-journalist”, although she bakes as she claims for decades did not realize that the journalist’s job is to judge both Tsipras and Famello and Mitsotakis and anyone who thinks he should judge. And as PASOK MP Evangelia Liakoulis rightly stated, “the politician who can’t stand it is like the navy that the sea catches him.” For some reason, it seems that Elena Akrita tried to play (?) The role of Dramamine so that the fortunes would not catch Tsipras and Famello.
But since Mrs Akrita has mentioned me as annoying, it is good to stay, even clarifying some things. Let’s start with what everyone wants to accept for granted, but it’s not. That is, he is 40 years of baker-journalist. Mrs Akrita is not a journalist. He has registered with ESIEA, as anyone who worked in a newspaper with the required years of insurance. If we want to be precise, Mrs Akrita is a journalist who has had a successful column for many years in the Lambraki band. To say so by invoking the example of the baker, Akrita did not bake hot reports, nor did she knead the hard dough of news with her hands. He wrote cheerful, successful stories and comments. He was in charge of the part of the oven that deals with the eaves, if with no puff pastry. I admit he was very successful in what he did and even though I am annoying to her, she has always been sympathetic to me.
I always read her column in the NEWS at the urging of my dad, who always read her and laughed. Sympathy, however, was also in a sense “in the apostasy” as our positive evaluation included the goodwill we gave family to Akrita, wanting to save it well to include it in the progressive space so as not to belong to it only the humble and despised. Psychologically we wanted not to be alone and so we imagine her brave move, to lift her somewhat from the table of her living room to look as our suffering “Bithoula”.
Elena Akrita, often the densely involved in the role of being in the role (which Evangelos Giannopoulos also said), who was choosing, doing her job and building her career. Although she wants to believe and show that it was the ethics of ethics and the careful crisis, her texts have often had neither anonymous sources nor branded, but inexplicable function. She may even attempt to justify her deviations on her Facebook page on the argument “I call them a check” but it must recognize this right to others.
I will only quote a text that he signed to the NEWS on September 3, 2018 entitled “Is Katerina Sexism?” It was about Katerina Notopoulou, who had just taken over a ministerial position and had received sexist comments that I had to imply various miserable and derogatoryly for the way he occupied the position. In her article on Notopoulou Elena Akrita ends by writing:
“There has always been politics and everywhere, they have been given posts to women who were sidelined by people of value. Katerina Notopoulou will be considered a victim of sexism, only if all that is thrown into her meteral development is false. But if it is true, then she is not the victim, but the perpetrator. A victim of all those who were sidelined to rise. And if here is “everyone is equal but women are more equal than men” then we are not talking about sexism. Then we are talking about the circumvention of equality and equal opportunities »
Progressive woman and journalist Elena Akrita does not disrupt the misery, but calls on the victim of Notopoulou, to prove that she is not an elephant or a woman who developed through other methods related to her … maneuvers. That is, if one wrote that Akrita belongs to the category of women who evolved as they describe about Notopoulou, did she heal to prove the opposite? And because there is no way of notopoulou to prove this, they are strangely and suspected.
He slaughtered Notopoulou publicly and in the most defensive way, but, all, he has asked a question about the custom of slaughter at the “Taurus Festival” in Lesvos which is bothering her.
Elena Akrita today chose to attack Documento, appearing as an honor, a sacred examination and a sacred holder of journalistic ethics, even talking about a journalism she has never exercised. He chooses to work with a narrative and this may not be so bad if the narrative does not offend cutting -edge and sidewalks who do their job. Asked by what proves good services to Tsipras and Famello. Become their necessary dramamine.
In the context of this narrative, Elena Akrita shows statements made by ND officials in favor of Documento, as proof of his poor quality, since she has been in opposition to “Mitsotakis’ lawsuit for what he wrote about his 40 homes with witness”.
Here we have the narrative of the Akrita victim, who pays the brave of the act (what he wrote about 40 houses Mitsotakis) as opposed to the documento supported by the Mitsotakians. And because it is not an Akrita cheering, but a violation of reality, let us remind you that for Mitsotakis’ 40 houses, Voltaire’s house, wherever you are, Mareva Grabowski’s intervention and many more, Documento has revealed. There was a lawsuit against the newspaper (yes with witness Makis Voridis) and was acquitted.
Elena Akrita repeated them in a post she made to support Stefanos Kasselakis’ wife, putting some sauces for which the treatment was made. Documento has handed over to its lawyers all the evidence of what it has revealed and Costas Vaxevanis has stated that it is at their disposal for any help even to testify as a witness.
So for some reason, Elena Akrita decided to put them with Documento. A reason she revealed herself with her message to her party. Executives of SYRIZA, PASOK, the young, the Democracy Movement (and not just the ND), the ESIEA, have made statements to support the Documento. With the exception of Socrates Famello, who is favored (during his shallow political crisis) by the Akrita attack, SYRIZA’s staffing potential is on the rails.
In addition to this attack, a problem for the party is (as many branded and anonymous sources say, if Mrs Akrita allows us) that despite the situation, to serve the president, the party is crawling on the Akrita line.
That is to say, when the polls showed that Efi Achcioglou would prevail, Achtsioglou supported and when the first round showed as a future president Stefanos Kasselakis went with Kasselakis (even with Tyler). He left Polakis as a genuine politician and courageous but then, when he appeared to be in the intra -party battle, Famellos would prevail, he said that if Polakis defeated, that is, a homophobic, he would leave the party.
Elena Akrita, it seems that in some way, she is always on the right side of the story, that of the future president of the party. In this respect, the message that announces that it was attacked because Babuska, my master, criticizes Tsipras and Famello, creates confusion. Does he know something we don’t know? This is the dilemma of Kiki I love it but I like the coconut (to write it in a chef) or adhere to the folk, keep your clothes to have half. The picture is sad, but Elena Akrita alone gave herself a leading role to herself. It was not only to expect to be “unfortunate”.