THE Demis Nikolaidis commented on her new defeat AEK from Olympiacos and stressed that the Union has a spiritual problem rather than a football.
Speaking to Nova’s “Monday FC”, Demis Nikolaidis stressed that Matthias Almeida has not been thinking with a clear mind for quite some time, and claimed that he seems to be missing the plan for the next season.
At the same time, the AEK legend stressed that – if the Union does not continue with the Argentine coach on its bench – it would be important the way it will be managed. “If not managed properly, anyone who comes will leave in three months,” he said.
Demis Nikolaidis spoke …
For AEK fans left before the end of the platforms: “In Greece we have seen various ways for the fans to react. I didn’t like it, I can say it was a peaceful way though. They did not think of anything bad, but they thought that in this way they express their disapproval. I prefer this than to find the team. Not that I liked it. “
For AEK’s psychology: “A 100% coach team is AEK. When the coach is not good, he is not the team. It seems the thing. A bad myriad follows afterwards. You don’t have the psychology. What is your reaction? You want calm to get the goals. AEK may try, but playing things with stress and lack of psychology. So does AEK, it’s not that every match is worse. I think the problem is psychological and not football. Is it corrected? No. I didn’t expect four defeats, but I didn’t expect AEK to come second. “
For the match with Olympiacos and the new defeat: “Mandalos was the best of the match. He did everything. AEK went well, had the ball on his feet, he couldn’t score a goal. Pineda and Eliasson were missing. He did a passing game, but he had Simanski and Joneson. It was not lagging behind nothing but in the psychological part. It was a team anxious against a champion team. It was better than Olympiacos, but … Olympiacos had some luck and got it 0-2. We do not like us who are AEK to have lost so many times by Olympiacos. If you don’t start Pineda, in the second, why do you put it? It’s like mocking the brick. It does it bad, you don’t give him the opportunity to get a pace. Or when Eliasson enters, the forward comes out. The coach does not think clearly for a long time. “
Cthe next day at AEK: “The point is what happens after AEK. It can make two wins now in the next, but it doesn’t matter. The fact that AEK must have made decisions for a long time for the time being a given. What will end, does not change the conclusions. What worries is what happens after Almeida because Almeida will probably not be here. This administration came and found a coach. Now he will decide to get a new one if the coach changes. The young man should prove things with a new administration. Difficult things. As if the design is missing what’s going on next season. There is a lack of confidence because you do not know the administration and you do not know who is coming afterwards. It doesn’t matter which coach will come. It matters how AEK will be managed. If not managed properly, anyone who comes will leave in three months. The same with Almeida if left. As long as Almeida stays it is until he leaves. “