A mosaic of lasting conflicts, from Harilaou Trikoupi’s inability to form a powerful alternative pole of governance against New Democracy, is created in the PASOKwhere his executives are confronted with each other and at the same time send warning messages to leadership.
Open issues feed the different ‘lines’, Either about how PASOK will move upward the democratic needle – During Paul Geroulanou’s pause- or how they will answer the question of post-election collaborations.
THE Harris Duke He said “no” to collaboration with the New Democracy calling for an open conference that will ratify a decision and came to Panos Rucci, the father who lost his 22 -year -old son in Tempe, while the Anna Diamantopoulou he said to the leadership (who had made a statement of hunger strike support) that PASOK should not hold the “flag” of populism, nor should it become a party of Karystianou or Konstantopoulou.
“With a minimal empathy, the conversation would have to end in front of the sacredness of the father’s request, Panos Rucci. But the government is hiding, ”he said a few hours later from the House of Representatives. Paul Geroulan and the Harris Kastanidis Addressing Anna Diamantopoulou essentially, she attempted to respond with a comment: “The battle against populism presupposes that those who give it have sufficiently understood what populism is. Populism is not the defense of the popular and the respect of wounded people. Let them try to learn by starting from Ernesto Laclau. “
Androulakis Station
This… nice atmosphere is shared in PASOK, reading the polls and distinguishing a long distance from critical electoral audiences each time. Harilaou Trikoupi is fortified behind the TIF, stating that her presence was particularly popular and that the program is a “gospel” but does not clarify what the next steps of design will be with the aim of the intended jump.
Mr. Geroulanos Speaking at a party event in Kilkis He noted that if the needle does not move (in the polls) over the next two months, then there would be a problem moving towards the elections. Mr Doukas had earlier indicated that an open open conference must be held immediately to decide who they wanted to “play” post -election.
THE Nikos Androulakis However, he thinks that all this has been answered and that he has nothing to say to executives asking the questions and dilemmas for the next day. His interlocutors simply say that with these public interventions, executives show their “stress” for the next day- “we all have to fight for PASOK’s victory in the elections.”
In the gallop, of course, the phrase Androulakis for “victory even with one vote” does not look like in the present time with a realistic target. The New Democracy has a strong lead of about 15 percentage points, while in the area of the fragmented center -left, it is heard that Alexis Tsipras’ or Iidi’s “return” scenario or Iidis of another party under Mrs. Karystianou can soon be done.
In any case, as the elections approach the environment, the environment will become more competitive and full of “surprises” for PASOK, which had reached 20% in November but quickly began to lose pieces to other parties and the indefinite vote. The moment of the rallies for Tempi was typical, where as Ms. Diamantopoulou reminded, not the rates of PASOK, but the cruise freedom.
The 2+1 PASOK souls and the intra -party confrontation
In the past, in times of crisis, the Kostas Laliotis In order to stimulate the climate, he would tell the executives that PASOK is seven -discipline. Recently In a tet-a-tete of Harry Doukas with Anna Diamantopoulou, on the occasion of Art Athina 2025 in Zappeion The mayor of Athens returned and told PASOK’s head of political planning that “we are PASOK’s two souls” to answer him with the question “do you want to become one?”
Party executives point out that Ms. Diamantopoulou has a political and ideological “identity” for years, and Haris Doukas is taking daily steps to highlight his own “angles” in his profile. He is in favor of the center -left opening, having made the first rehearsal in the municipality of Athens, as is the other leadership contender, Pavlos Geroulanos often talks about the need for progressive convergence. Anna Diamantopoulou, on the other hand, says that PASOK has nothing to do with tactics and model SYRIZA. An indication was her speech at a party event in Kilkis.
Anna’s nails
“We now have the responsibility, not to become Karystianou, nor to become Constantopoulou. We had the responsibility to bring the issues to the House, to give all the information, to demand answers, ”was her warning Anna Diamantopoulou From the “titles” of her speech on the goals of the party, the political scene in which it moves and its difficulty in shaking the democratic needle with faster speed than the image of recent months.
With her intervention at the event, the political planning officer also openly opposed SYRIZA’s tactics, while stressing that PASOK’s role is to maintain a balance in the political system by preventing populist methods.
“It is very important to maintain political dialogue, to maintain the political balance in the system, insisted, explaining that:” Otherwise, in a Europe that is “ejected” and they are all on the streets- because we have passed all this, the punches, the voices, and to break them, Political tranquility. “
Her reference to ‘no’ to the model of sailing freedom or her public interventions Maria Karystianou He also attempted to be reinforced by the reminder of the relationship with the society that Andreas Papandreou had. As Ms. Diamantopoulou said: “Karystianou came out. Very nice. It became “I don’t have oxygen” and a million people gathered. Do you remember what followed? Do you remember that Constantopoulou was suddenly created? Can this kind of reaction bring about the worst form of populism we saw on Tsipras? We are not a party that will become Konstantopoulou. We are a party we come from a very big politician who grabbed the masses in essence. He didn’t get the masses on the street, just. So we now have the responsibility, not to become Karystianou, nor to become Konstantopoulou. We had the responsibility to bring the issues to the House, to give all the information, to demand answers. We have, of course, participated in whatever events that took place, but our institutional function is what will change the data. And I tell you this: Did you see what happened with all this story and the way Mrs. Constantopoulou worked? Did you see that a whole bunch of processes and things were lied to? “
Executives against the “climate” of Diamantopoulou estimate that with this rhetoric PASOK will be permanently cut off by center -left forces of society, some of which have fled to the rallies for Tempi and listening carefully to the demands of the relatives of the victims. There are others, however, insisting on the “line” that Mrs Diamantopoulou is engraving, calling on the leadership to take a clear position in favor of “the tendency that PASOK wants to guarantee political tranquility in the place and the promotion of reforms”.