In essence, at the same time that the government accuses PASOK of criminal populism in terms of submitting a proposal to set up a pre -trial committee for Tempi, it is attempting to secure PASOK the necessary consensus to proceed with the revisionist process by the revisionist process by the revisionist process as it is to proceed with the revisionist process. Review.
PASOK did not show that Maximus is dragged by the Mansion in the debate on the prime minister’s proposed changes to the Constitution articles (16, 14, 86, 103), but his circles reminded him of the issue of removing the permanence in the public sector, which he was in charge. After all, when PASOK’s top executive Costas Skandalidis (after clarifying) was accused of being “accused” of being in favor of removing the permanence then Harilaou Trikoupi reminded her position by noting that she did not agree with such a prospect.
Therefore, at least in terms of Article 103 of the Constitution linked to this hot issue, PASOK in a timely manner has clarified that it will not be discussed as long as the proposal eventually presented by the ND will concern this precisely by opening the window of departures to civil servants who have not been disciplined.
According to information, PASOK will present all its proposals on the issue of constitutional review next September- most likely in the context of its presence at the TIF- and will ask the other parties to take a stand on specific positions and proposals. The conclusion is that PASOK will not officially “pinch” the change of agenda that the government is seeking when it even places particular attention to its proposal for the establishment of a pre -trial committee for Tempi with a indictment seeking to control eight politicians. Indeed, it seems that his offensive tactic on the issue of pre -trial investigation, as well as PASOK’s choice to walk alone on this path, has rendered results as reflected in the last two polls by Metron Analysis and Opinion Poll with an increasing tendency of his rates.
For this reason, Harilaou Trikoupi insists that the prime minister in his latest radio interview spoke with inaccuracies and was exposed to the facts. The first major objection that came from PASOK to the so -called Mitsotakis and was elected and yesterday by Kostas Tsoukalas concerns the Prime Minister’s claim that under Article 291 of the Criminal Code, Larissa’s Investigator, Mr. Bakimis, were referred by the Criminal Code. Mitsotakis. According to Decision 637/2021 of the Supreme Court in relation to the article in question, “In order to make the particular risk of crime, it is objectively or in any way disturbed by an act or omission of the safety of rail communication.