Constantopoulou-Iloulanou’s controversy over PASOK’s proposal for Tempi pre-trial investigation

The president of the Freedom Facility argued that he “gives responsibility to the politicians involved for felonies”

PASOK’s proposal for the establishment of a pre -trial committee on the Tempe case was at the heart of intense criticism from the plenary session of the House, the President of Freedom Freedom, Zoe Konstantopoulou, who accused the official opposition, “

Immediate was the reaction of PASOK’s parliamentary spokesman, Paul Geroulanou, who opposed that “our proposal is completely institutional and complete. We are not given to anyone and reserve all the actions we need to do in parliament. ” The president of Freedom Freedom described PASOK’s proposal, “incomplete, with many omissions and without containing all the crimes and all the persons involved in the crime of Tempi and of course Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis.”

“I am sorry, because after the experience of the proposal for Mr Triantopoulos, unfortunately it shows a willingness to facilitate a very serious part of the persons involved and to give criminal responsibility for human life criminal responsibility,” said Mrs Konstantopoulou and continued: Galatomy and galable to give a prime minister, for whom it appears, that from the beginning to the end he knew, knew, wanted and participated in criminal omissions, the deception of the public, the split of public money without infrastructure and the human life exposure, systematically. He has no right to give these responsibilities. “

“Freedom navigation will continue the effort to gather the 30 signatures required to submit as a proposal to set up a pre -trial committee of all charges resulting from the data, which all refer to the need for prosecution,” concluded Mrs Konstantopoulou. “Our proposal is absolutely complete. And is complete for a reason. Why do we insist on linking data to the House of Procedures, “Mr. Geroulanos replied and added:

“What we want is to show respect for the House to get a result here. To finally understand who respects the House and who does not respect it. If we want to highlight that ND really does what it can not have a light on the case, we must be completely institutional on our part. We do this based on the information coming from the case file. ” “We are not given to anyone and we are reserved for all the actions we can do in parliament, and we will continue to do so, because our first priority is to shine the truth,” Mr Geroulanos concluded.


]

Source link

Leave a Comment