The US President’s Peace Plan Donald Trump for the Gauze It is presented as the most serious and constituted to date by his government to end the conflict, as CNN reports.
It is about 20 -point designwhich Trump himself described as ‘One of the most important days in culture’, raising the bar of expectations. The proposal for Gaza is based on a gradual application and is accompanied by the promise of a political future for the Palestinians, while theoretically paves the way for a mediation process in the Israel -Palestine conflict.
The Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu appeared to support the plan, arguing that it covers Israel’s goals: Return of hostages, neutralizing Hamas and safeguarding security.
On her side the Hamas, It shows some reluctance to hand over the 48 remaining hostages or to accept disarmament. Her executives declare that They do not trust the intentions of neither Netanyahu nor Trump. The requirement for hostage release within 72 hours is considered by analysts almost impossiblewhile fears are raising that Israel, after taking them back, will start businesses again if the tymer -democratic organization is not disarmed.
At the same time The absence of substantial Palestinian participation is criticized in the design of the plan while the forecast for International “Peace Council” with a dominant role of Trump and involvement of persons such as Tony Blair It causes strong reactions due to historical loads.
In its analysis, CNN emphasizes that Trump’s optimism very often does not go hand in hand with reality.
The failure of his previous peacekeeping initiative at Ukrainian shows the boundaries of a diplomacy based on statements and photos, No longevity investment.
Overall, the new plan for Gaza offers a rare set of outlook for a ceasefire, but the thorns remain: the internal political dynamics in Israel, the unobtrusive attitude of Hamas, the lack of Palestinian voice and the usual tendency of the Middle East peace initiatives.
A prominent disadvantage of Trump’s plan is that it suffers from a characteristic defect of such initiatives: the lack of contribution by the Palestinians themselves.
Hamas’s choices
Hamas is facing difficult and critical choices.
If he says ‘yes’
Acceptance of the proposal by Hamas will be assumption of defeat. For Israel, this will also be a strategic victory for Washington a diplomatic paper that will still show that it can form developments in the Middle East.
If he says ‘no’
If Hamas refuses, the new escalation is inevitable. Israel, with the open coverage of the US, will attempt to neutralize Hamas. This means new bombings, thousands of dead, massive disasters. Hamas will want to appear as a “resistance” that did not succumb to humiliating terms, but the price can be fatal.