Owens created a video for her YouTube channel titled: “Is the first lady of France a man?”in which he first reproduced the libelous comment. Owens promoted it on X, writing:
“Stop everything and watch it! It is not a joke or an exaggeration to say that, aside from political assassinations, this is probably the biggest political scandal in history,” according to the Telegraph.
In 2024, Brigitte Macron spoke about the personal impact of all these rumours:
“All these charges have had a profound impact on both me and the people around me. Every time I travel abroad, someone mentions it. There is no wife of a head of state who has not heard it.”
The phenomenon of “transvestigation”
A post by France 24 talks about a wider online trend known as transvestigation – a set of pseudo-researchers who claim that many celebrities are secretly transgender.
As the professor of psychology at the University of Cambridge explains Sander van der Linden, “these theories reinforce the distrust towards the political system and feed on the mood of control and rebellion against the elites”.
Brigitte Macron, an older woman married to a highly controversial president, became almost an “ideal target”.
The trial and the risk of vindication
Brigitte Macron – after months of tolerance – her husband Emmanuel Macron and her brother, Jean-Michel Tronier, took legal action against those who peddled the theory – among them Natasha Rey, Amandine Roi Roi (aka Delphine Z.), Xavier Poussard and Kanda Owens.
THE the family’s attorney, Tom Clarestated that they are willing to provide “scientific evidence” in the pending trial in the US to prove that Brigitte Macron was born a woman.
Eight men and two women accused of sexist cyberbullying against Brigitte Macron went on trial on Monday (27.10.2025) before the Paris Criminal Court.
The convicts, who include an advertiser, an elected official, a gallerist, a teacher, a psychic, a computer scientist and others, range in age from 41 to 60.
The harsher penalties were imposed against him advertiserknown on social media as alias “Zoé Sagan”who, among other things, in his posts characterized Brigitte Macron’s age difference with her husband as “pedophilia”. In his apology, he spoke of “satirical” publications, considering that he is protected by freedom of expression.
“France has satire in its DNA. Brigitte Macron could post pregnancy photos to end debate’ thought fit to add to his testimony.
During the hearing, Mr 65-year-old Jean-Luc M.a retired businessman and deputy mayor of a village in the Seine-et-Loire, was asked about posts in which he called Brigitte Macron “our first ladyboy”.
He denied the allegations of harassment, saying he “never intended to cause harm”.
THE Bertrand S., art gallery owner, he also denied the accusation of harassment, saying he shared related posts because he considered the issue “a global issue with implications for France.” He said he believed that if enough people talked about it, “Macron would be forced to give answers.”
Also present at the court was 41-year-old daughter of Brigitte Macron, Tiffen Ozierwho during her testimony denounced “the hatred” directed at her mother with the “systematic questioning” of her “identity, her gender” and her “integrity”, adding that she had initially “underestimated the extent of the phenomenon”, but gradually found that the whole affair was creating stress for both her mother and the grandchildren of the first lady of Franceswho were often asked about them “for the gender of their grandmother.”
She also described how her mother constantly has to be careful about what she wears or how she behaves, fearing that her image could be “distorted” and used as a weapon online.
However, these trials are double knife. They may restore the First Lady’s reputation and send a message that slander has consequences – but at the same time they risk rekindling the lie itself.
In an age where information travels rapidly and uncontrollably, fake news has evolved into a powerful tool for controlling public opinion.
As van der Linden notes, “conspiracy theorists tend to see any attempt at refutation as confirmation that something is being hidden.”
Even a DNA test, if made public, could simply be considered “fabricated”.
Information France 24
Source link