Fierce attack on the government and in the New Democracy For what happened in the vote of the proposals for setting up a pre -trial committee on the case OPECEPE K. Nikos Androulakis.
THE chairman of PASOK Speaking in plenary and commenting initially the participation of several majority MPs in yesterday’s vote vote, he said: “I came with the desire to welcome the ND letter to Parliament. But I don’t see her here. I would ask the bureau to invite them to return. The vote is over. Let them not be afraid. “
“I will send them a letter to inform them” the presidency reacted in a similar disposition Olga Gerovasil.
Mr Androulakis argued that the majority attitude was a “parliamentary diversion”, he said the prime minister did not trust his MPs while claiming that the vote for the pre -trial is invalid as at least 151 Members were involved.
“The prime minister fears the free will of his Members. It has 3 categories of Members. The self -informed, the semi -controlled and the uncontrolled. His anxiety to protect Voridis – Avgenakis led him to unprecedented approaches and self -gaze, ”he said.
‘You used the letter to set up a House of humiliation’
“You didn’t leave or stay in the vote. You made sly improvisations dark. Let’s ask a clear question. You will stay or leave. Neither stayed nor left by trampling on Constitution Because we have a blackmailed prime minister. Such as the criminal organization of OPECEPE With the “butchers” and “frappe” they took advantage of the temporary technical solution to make millions of euros in the weight of the people, so yesterday the “Maximus Frames” and “Haippers of the House” used the temporary expansion of a pandemic.
It should be noted that although the opposition parties denounced during yesterday’s process possible withdrawal of the ND CO from the vote, the minority MPs eventually abstained from the ballot. In total, 83 MPs eventually participated in the vote.
“Article 67 of the Constitution says that since there is no involvement of 151 Members there is no voting effect. So what did you achieve? A hole in the water. You have been degraded and are in front of your two executives in justice to check the responsibilities described by the European Public Prosecutor’s Office, “Mr Androulakis argued to add:” There is a procedural precedent. Three times a similar issue arose. Again under the responsibility of the ND in the period 2008 -09. The interpretation of no. 67 I described was accepted by your own Speaker of the House, the late Dimitris Sioufas. So you did anything. You are dangerous to institutions and democracy. “
What had happened in 2009
The PASOK president cited, inter alia, the pre -trial proposal discussion that his party had filed in 2009 against the then Minister of Shipping. Aristotle Pavlidis for a case involving the barren ships. The ND by the decision of the then president Kostas Karamanlis It was abstinence from secret ballot.
Intervening in the debate held in plenary. Evangelos Venizelos He said, among other things: “This image is today heartbreaking, institutional tragic. Mr. Karamanlis It does not allow its Members to be present, does not allow the opposition to exercise its rights, does not allow the House to stand up to the circumstances. We will not drive our own proposal to artificial rejection. I beg you, Mr President, to declare the debate over, but to know Mr Karamanlis, and above all, the Greek citizen knows that the New Democracy government is full of stigma, pending and deadlock. “
In response to the Speaker of the House Dimitris Sioufas He said: “So I repeat this prompt for the five political leaders to find ways to understand all these great issues. Thank you very much for your understanding. However, you will allow me to repeat what I closed in both of the previous times the meeting in a similar debate, that the rejection or acceptance of the proposal in the Constitution and the regulation is done by mystical vote. I can’t add anything else. Ladies and gentlemen, do you accept at this point to solve the meeting? “