All the defendants for the implementation of the 43 -year -old Polish professor of Berkeley in Agia Paraskevi were judged temporary prisonersincluding former wife of the victimwho earlier waited for the investigator and prosecutor.
After a long apologetic process launched in the morning, investigator and prosecutor ruled that both 35 -year -old executor as well as the Three foreign accomplices of his, as well as the ex -husband, must be taken to prison for the murder that happened to July 4 in Agia Paraskevi.
The apologies of the accused
THE murder He was first driven for apology at the Investigative Office in the morning. There he repeated the homology he had given pre -trial, declaring repentant for his act. He claimed that he had not consulted with any of his co -defendants and allegedly reiterated that his partner, who is accused of being accused of incitement In homicide, she has no involvement in crime against her ex -husband, taking over fully responsibility.
Followed the apologies of of three defendants for synergyamong which and one underage. They stated that they did not know that they assisted in ambushas the 35 -year -old had reported to them that it was merely for intimidation of the professor. The minor allegedly told the investigator that he was found in the rented jeep, who was driving a 21 -year -old compatriot, carrying the perpetrator to the scene of the crime, mainly from curiosity for the car, as it was a well -known accurate brand.
The role of the 43 -year -old and the data case
Last apologized the 43 -year -old womanwhich, according to the indictment, is the one who persuaded her partner to kill the teacher. The accused allegedly was in controversy with the victim for the twins minor children their. The 43 -year -old said from the outset innocenthowever Police findings but also allegations of one of the associates they seem to be attributable to her central role in the organization and coordination of the murder. Apologizing, the 43 -year -old allegedly said she knew nothing about her partner’s intention to kill her children’s father.
She also stressed that she had no reason to kill her ex -husband. On the contrary, as he opposes the category, this was not in her interest, as the victim backed She and their children.